Anatomic accuracy, physiologic characteristics, and fidelity of very low birth weight infant airway simulators

Abstract

Background Medical simulation training requires realistic simulators with high fidelity. This prospective multi-center study investigated anatomic precision, physiologic characteristics, and fidelity of four commercially available very low birth weight infant simulators. Methods We measured airway angles and distances in the simulators Premature AirwayPaul (SIMCharacters), Premature Anne (Laerdal Medical), Premie HAL S2209 (Gaumard), and Preterm Baby (Lifecast Body Simulation) using computer tomography and compared these to human cadavers of premature stillbirths. The simulators’ physiologic characteristics were tested, and highly experienced experts rated their physical and functional fidelity. Results The airway angles corresponded to those of the reference cadavers in three simulators. The nasal inlet to glottis distance and the mouth aperture to glottis distance were only accurate in one simulator. All simulators had airway resistances up to 20 times higher and compliances up to 19 times lower than published reference values. Fifty-six highly experienced experts gave three simulators (Premature AirwayPaul: 5.1 ± 1.0, Premature Anne 4.9 ± 1.1, Preterm Baby 5.0 ± 1.0) good overall ratings and one simulator (Premie HAL S2209: 2.8 ± 1.0) an unfavorable rating. Conclusion The simulator physiology deviated significantly from preterm infants’ reference values concerning resistance and compliance, potentially promoting a wrong ventilation technique. Impact Very low birth weight infant simulators showed physiological properties far deviating from corresponding patient reference values. Only ventilation with very high peak pressure achieved tidal volumes in the simulators, as aimed at in very low birth weight infants, potentially promoting a wrong ventilation technique. Compared to very low birth weight infant cadavers, most tested simulators accurately reproduced the anatomic angular relationships, but their airway dimensions were relatively too large for the represented body. The more professional experience the experts had, the lower they rated the very low birth weight infant simulators.

A Prospective Observational Crossover Study Comparing Intubation by Pediatric Residents Using Video Laryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy on a Pierre Robin Simulation Manikin

“…The manikin has fixed anatomy and does not fully mimic physiological conditions. Despite this, the tactile and visual fidelity of this manikin has been found to correlate well with human anatomy 17,18 …”

“…Despite this, the tactile and visual fidelity of this manikin has been found to correlate well with human anatomy. 17,18 Second, this was a single-center study. Pediatric residents in other centers or other training schemes may have more intubation experience or different intubation training.…”

Five vs. two initial rescue breaths during infant basic life support: A manikin study using bag-mask-ventilation

“…In our study either the predefined QCPR normal (20–40 ml) or a broader TV interval (20–60 ml) were applied, but it should be acknowledged both are still arbitrary. Whilst infant manikins are developed to closely resemble the true infant, they differ from clinical reality ( 12 , 13 ).…”

Anatomical investigations on the upper airway in premature and newborn babies

“…Recent advances in clinical practice have led to an enhanced training of practitioners. Both clinical practice and high‐fidelity simulators play an important role in the acquisition of airway management skills in neonatology (Lengua Hinojosa et al, 2021). The use of simulators is becoming increasingly important.…”