Anatolian linguistic influences in Early Greek (1500–800 BC)? Critical observations against sociolinguistic and areal background

Oreshko, Rostislav

doi:10.31826/jlr-2018-161-209

“…To this point we quoteOreshko (2018), though his conclusion is here not fully shared since the non-shared lexical borrowings do not automatically lead to the non borrowability in the domains of morphology and syntax.10.1163/26670755-01010006 | cotticelli-kurras Old World: Journal of Ancient Africa and Eurasia (2021) 1-19 Downloaded from Brill.com11/08/2021 01:50:53AM via free access…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Concept of an Anatolian-Greek Language Area

Cotticelli-Kurras

¹

2021

Old World J. Anc. Afr. Eurasia

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims at presenting some thoughts on the hypothesis of an Anatolian-Greek language area in the second millennium bc comparing different approaches both in the theoretical frames and in the analysis of the linguistic facts. For this purpose, it is necessary to introduce some terminological premises, followed by a selection of methodological issues, which will help explore the putative features that characterize the Anatolian-Greek area (morphological traits such as actionality markers, particles, verbal prefixes as well as special morphological forms; morphosyntactic traits, such as modal particles, sentence particles, absolute participial constructions; lexical units and phonetic features).

show abstract

“…To this point we quoteOreshko (2018), though his conclusion is here not fully shared since the non-shared lexical borrowings do not automatically lead to the non borrowability in the domains of morphology and syntax.10.1163/26670755-01010006 | cotticelli-kurras Old World: Journal of Ancient Africa and Eurasia (2021) 1-19 Downloaded from Brill.com12/13/2021 01:55:08AM via free access…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Archaeology of Early Chinese Settlement in Southeast Asia

Miksic

¹

2021

Old World J. Anc. Afr. Eurasia

1

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Little historical information is available about early Chinese settlement in Southeast Asia. By the 15th century several Chinese settlements of significant size had formed, but they vanished by the time the Portuguese reached the region. This article surveys the historical literature on these early overseas Chinese settlements, and summarizes the contributions which archaeology can make to clarifying the timing and nature of the process.

show abstract