2016
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Is Different Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Surgery

Abstract: The clinical manifestations of and risk factors for AL were different between MIS and OS. AL after MIS may be more influenced by factors related to technical difficulties. Close attention should be given to patients undergoing surgery with risk factors for AL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
53
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study investigating SILS reported that the average number of staples for total mesorectal excision was 4 and an average of 6 was used for partial mesorectal excision . Furthermore, an increased number of stapler applications for distal rectum transection has been established as risk factor for anastomotic leakage . In the case of rectal cancer in our series, we made an additional suprapubic port for stapler access and safe rectal transection, which was not pure single‐incision robotic surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A previous study investigating SILS reported that the average number of staples for total mesorectal excision was 4 and an average of 6 was used for partial mesorectal excision . Furthermore, an increased number of stapler applications for distal rectum transection has been established as risk factor for anastomotic leakage . In the case of rectal cancer in our series, we made an additional suprapubic port for stapler access and safe rectal transection, which was not pure single‐incision robotic surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to recent studies, male gender, preoperative chemo-radiotherapy, lower tumor location as well as increased number of stapler application for distal rectal transection have been established risk factors for AL. [1113] Although there seems to be an overall consensus that AL is related to poor prognosis, the oncologic consequence in patients with AL is uncertain. There are several contradictory studies with respect to long-term and cancer-specific survival of patients with AL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] This reflects that variable physiologic and biochemical processes after different surgical approaches may influence the clinical manifestation of AL. In this context, we hypothesize that the oncologic outcomes after AL may differ in relation to various clinical, biochemical, and pathological factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anastomotic leakage, with the incidents ranging from 2.7% to 28%, remains potentially fatal surgical complication both short‐term operative and long‐term oncologic outcomes after LAR, which because of possible risk factors including age, ASA, BMI, tumor location, hemoglobin, blood loss, and operation time . As we all know, radiation can decrease oxygen delivery to the tissues and postpone healing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%