2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3795-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: diagnostic accuracy of CT

Abstract: • CT accurately diagnosed clinically suspected colorectal AL and showed good interobserver agreement • Contrast extravasation was the most sensitive and specific CT sign • Retrograde contrast enema during CT improved positive predictive value • Retrograde contrast enema decreased false-negative or indeterminate original CT interpretations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
40
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
40
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of our study was to evaluate potential radiological variables to predict outcome of BC before initiating treatment rather than being an evaluation instrument after anastomosis salvage treatment, therefore including investigations on establishment of the AL diagnosis rather than from follow-up. When confirming AL, CE has been reported to be superior to a CT scan omitting rectal contrast in evaluating anastomotic integrity (8), thus this is the reason why we only included CE studies. The rationale for selecting certain radiological variables in this exploratory work was based on putative reproducibility and consistency rather than visual interpretations of morphological appearance as applied in one study (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The purpose of our study was to evaluate potential radiological variables to predict outcome of BC before initiating treatment rather than being an evaluation instrument after anastomosis salvage treatment, therefore including investigations on establishment of the AL diagnosis rather than from follow-up. When confirming AL, CE has been reported to be superior to a CT scan omitting rectal contrast in evaluating anastomotic integrity (8), thus this is the reason why we only included CE studies. The rationale for selecting certain radiological variables in this exploratory work was based on putative reproducibility and consistency rather than visual interpretations of morphological appearance as applied in one study (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrast enema (CE) is a radiological method to demonstrate established criteria for AL (6). CE has been reported as having high specificity and moderate sensitivity for AL with a high correlation to clinical findings (7) and is considered superior to computed tomography (CT) without rectal contrast in evaluating AL (8). CE can be employed to confirm a suspicion of AL or to evaluate anastomotic integrity before defunctioning stoma reversal (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies by Huiberts et al [ 9 ] and Kauv et al [ 10 ] showed that leakage of contrast medium was the only independent predictive factor for AL. In our institution, abdominal CT scanning with rectal contrast enema (RCE) in cases where there is suspicion of AL has been the standard imaging procedure for over 6 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that assessment of specific CT findings was useful for the prediction of anastomotic leakage after gastric and colorectal surgery [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%