1995
DOI: 10.1080/00231940.1995.11758294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anasazi Sandal Features: Their Research Value and Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selection of sandal attributes to be studied was guided by previous archaeological textile analyses completed by Sibley and Jakes (1989) and by Deegan (1995). These attributes were analyzed and used to create a plausible cultural context for Anasazi sandals based on the model developed by Sibley and Jakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Selection of sandal attributes to be studied was guided by previous archaeological textile analyses completed by Sibley and Jakes (1989) and by Deegan (1995). These attributes were analyzed and used to create a plausible cultural context for Anasazi sandals based on the model developed by Sibley and Jakes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research by Deegan (1995) and Sibley and Jakes (1989) revealed that archaeological textiles, and Anasazi sandals in particular, should be studied for a variety of attributes: 1) yam structure (diameter, twist direction, number of ply); 2) silhouettes (toe, heel, shaped to foot or not); 3) fabric construction (density, motif incorporation) ; 4) colors and motifs; and 5) tie system. Data for this study were collected in these five categories.…”
Section: Methodology Data Gathering and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58-59). Thus far, studies of sandals and baskets from Anasazi rockshelters on the Colorado Plateau (e.g., Christenson, 1993;Deegan, 1992Deegan, , 1993Deegan, , 1995Deegan, , 1996Hays-Gilpin et al, 1998;Kankainen, 1995;Morris, 1995;Webster and Hays-Gilpin, 1994) are oriented more toward the technology of their manufacture than the organization of their production. Technological studies of sandals and baskets offer Southwestern archaeologists the opportunity to interpret social boundaries, if not ethnicity (Stark, 1998); such analyses should be a priority of future work on these materials.…”
Section: Baymanmentioning
confidence: 99%