1984
DOI: 10.1002/em.2860060306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaphase‐telophase analysis of chromosomal damage induced by chemicals

Abstract: Three main aspects involved in the chemical induction of anaphase-telophase aberrations in the first mitosis after treatment were analyzed: 1) the relationship between the frequency of anaphase-telophase aberrations and the time of fixation after treatment; 2) the dose-response relationships; and 3) the proliferative rate of cells exposed to chemicals which interact with DNA by different mechanisms. Experiments were carried out using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The compounds examined were adriamycin (AD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lagging fragments are clearly related with clastogenic events. Chromatin bridges are a consequence of spontaneous or induced chromosome stickiness [Olivero and Dulout, 1984] that results in chromosome fragments (clastogenic effect) or daughter chromatids with more or less DNA than normal. This cannot be considered an aneugenic event because the number of chromosomes does not change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lagging fragments are clearly related with clastogenic events. Chromatin bridges are a consequence of spontaneous or induced chromosome stickiness [Olivero and Dulout, 1984] that results in chromosome fragments (clastogenic effect) or daughter chromatids with more or less DNA than normal. This cannot be considered an aneugenic event because the number of chromosomes does not change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosome counting and anaphase-telophase alterations were scored according to the criteria of Dulout and Natarajan [1987] and Dulout and Olivero [1984], respectively. For the analysis of CREST-stained micronuclei, an Olympus BX-40 microscope with an HBO 103 W/2 mercuric light was used.…”
Section: Scoring Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staining kinetochores in the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay (Eastmond and Tucker, 1989;Lynch and Parry, 1993;Kirsch-Volders et al, 1997;Thompson and Perry, 1988) or in situ hybridization with centromere specific DNA probes, followed by immunofluorescent staining (Eastmond and Pinkel, 1990;Farooqi et al, 1993) are useful to discriminate between clastogens and aneuploidogens. Anaphase-telophase analysis, an ancilliary alternative test system (Nichols et al, 1972;Dulout and Olivero, 1984) has been used to evaluate aneugenic damage by counting lagging chromosomes (Seoane and Dulout, 1994;Seoane, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although accurate, FISH requires special equipment and costly reagents that are not available in most laboratories. An alternative ancillary test system is the analysis of alterations in the anaphasetelophase of cultured mitotic cells (Dulout and Olivero, 1984;Seoane and Dulout, 1994). This test is very simple and can be performed in any cytogenetic laboratory with cell culture facilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lagging fragments arising from chromosome breaks and chromatin bridges are considered indicators of exchangetype aberrations. Lagging chromosomes are presumably produced by alterations at the level of the kinetochore (Dulout and Olivero, 1984;Seoane and Dulout, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%