2017 14th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/jcsse.2017.8025903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing user reviews in Thai language toward aspects in mobile applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another method proposed for sentiment classification is the utilization of cosine similarity, to classify the sentiment expressed by a user's comment [17]. Furthermore, there exist a significant number of related studies [18][19][20][21] that primarily focus on mining customer reviews and determining the polarity of the opinions expressed i n them.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method proposed for sentiment classification is the utilization of cosine similarity, to classify the sentiment expressed by a user's comment [17]. Furthermore, there exist a significant number of related studies [18][19][20][21] that primarily focus on mining customer reviews and determining the polarity of the opinions expressed i n them.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only three out of 70 studies explicitly answer a question from the initial Microsoft study. The second sub-table in Table 2 shows that only 3 studies (4%) explicitly refer their research question to an initial Microsoft one: [16,28,33]. Nine studies (13%) partly try to answer a MS question: [8-10, 30, 52, 62, 64, 65, 70].…”
Section: Impact Of the Microsoft 2014 Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Low Accuracy of Language Processing Tools. The aforementioned unique characteristics of Thai such as, Thai text does not contain any word/sentence boundary, makes it harder for Thai language processing tools such as TLTK 2 to yield a high accuracy [5,6,16,18]. Consequently, the stylometric features extraction process for Thai is noisier in comparison to English.…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preprocessing part of our solution transforms each document into a collection of fragments (i.e., collection of point sets) using a three steps process [33]: (i) partition each document into fxed size fragments; (ii) partition each fragment obtained from the frst step into fxed size chunks 4 ; and (iii) extract the 46 stylometric features (i.e., writing style markers) from each chunk. To obtain reliable stylometric statistics from each fragment and the chunk, we fx their sizes to 7,000 and 700 tokens 5 , respectively. As a result, each chunk is transformed into a point, each fragment is transformed into a point set and each document is transformed into a collection of point sets in 46-dimensional space.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation