Analyzing Urban Poverty: A Summary of Methods and Approaches

Abstract

In recent years an extensive body of literature has emerged on the definition, measurement and analysis of poverty. Much of this literature focuses on analyzing poverty at the national level, or spatial disaggregation by general categories of urban or rural areas with adjustments made for regional price differentials. Yet for an individual city attempting to tackle the problems of urban poverty, this level of aggregation is not sufficient for answering specific questions such as where the poor are located in the city, whether there are differences between poor areas, if access to services varies by subgroup, whether specific programs are reaching the poorest, and how to design effective poverty reduction programs and policies. Answering these questions is critical, particularly for large, sprawling cities with highly diverse populations and growing problems of urban poverty.Understanding urban poverty presents a set of issues distinct from general poverty analysis and thus may require additional tools and techniques. This paper summarizes the main issues in conducting urban poverty analysis, with a focus on presenting a sample of case studies from urban areas that were implemented by a number of different agencies using a range of analytical approaches for studying urban poverty. Specific conclusions regarding design and analysis, data, timing, cost, and implementation issues are discussed.

Urban violence and public health in Latin America: a sociological explanatory framework

“…The Latin American rural population has remained stable at around 128 million, and rural poverty (while more dramatic) has not increased as rapidly as urban poverty 14 . Traditional rural violence and some political conflicts continue in peasant areas, including the guerrilla warfare in Colombia and Mexico, but the number of homicides they produce is insignificant as compared to deaths in cities.…”

Correlates of Extreme Poverty in Rural Ethiopia

“…Regarding AECI, the cut-off point for extreme poverty was designated at 1,600 kcal/day per adult. The asset ownership indicator was based on range of important farming and household assets (Baker and Schuler 2004 ). We also attempted to accommodate several explanatory household variables in the models based on marginality literature and the data available from the WMS and HICE survey datasets.…”

Journal of Politics and Law, Vol.1, No.1, March 2008

“…Approaches used to measure poverty include benefit receipt, income/expenditure levels and indicators of deprivation (e.g., see Baker & Schuler, 2004). One of the most common reasons for setting a poverty line is in order to calculate poverty rates (Baker & Schuler, 2004).…”

“…One of the most common reasons for setting a poverty line is in order to calculate poverty rates (Baker & Schuler, 2004). These can then be used to monitor change over time.…”