2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11060722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the Uncertainty of Estimating Forest Aboveground Biomass Using Optical Imagery and Spaceborne LiDAR

Abstract: Accurate estimation of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) is important for carbon accounting. Forest AGB estimation has been conducted with a variety of data sources and prediction methods, but many uncertainties still exist. In this study, six prediction methods, including Gaussian processes, stepwise linear regression, nonlinear regression using a logistic model, partial least squares regression, random forest, and support vector machines were used to estimate forest AGB in Jiangxi Province, China, by combinin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of samples and the selection of environmental variables are two key factors that affect the accuracy of species distribution models. Generally, an increase in sample size leads to improved model accuracy, as demonstrated by various studies [21,[70][71][72][73]. In our study, the third and fourth AGB class models had relatively small sample sizes and significantly lower AUCs than the first and second AGB class models.…”
Section: Accuracy and Applicability Of Agb Estimation Modelssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The number of samples and the selection of environmental variables are two key factors that affect the accuracy of species distribution models. Generally, an increase in sample size leads to improved model accuracy, as demonstrated by various studies [21,[70][71][72][73]. In our study, the third and fourth AGB class models had relatively small sample sizes and significantly lower AUCs than the first and second AGB class models.…”
Section: Accuracy and Applicability Of Agb Estimation Modelssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For forest biomass models derived from remote sensing data, the RF non-parametric model represents one of the best estimation models in terms of accuracy, with larger R 2 and smaller RMSE as compared to other parametric and non-parametric methods (Sun et al 2019). The linear regression achieved less accuracy of the estimate, probably due to the nonlinear relationship between remote sensing predictors and the observed forest AGB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Most studies related to AGB modeling have used the correlation between LiDARderived metrics and in situ measurements [52], applying various regression methods, such as linear regression [53], random forest (RF) algorithm [11], artificial neural networks [54], support vector machines [33], nonparametric regression [55] and Gaussian process regression [56]. Specifically, [54] tested the effectiveness of different statistical approaches for AGB stock and change (∆AGB) estimation, using a plot-based approach, in a selectively logged tropical forest, reporting that the ordinary least squares model provided the most accurate estimations compared with the machine learning algorithms (i.e., RF, k-nearest neighbor, SVM and ANN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%