2018
DOI: 10.1080/07380577.2018.1553086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the professional practice context using three lenses: An essential step for responding strategically

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings show how the three lenses of professional practice context analyses, namely, accountability, ethics, and professional-as-worker [ 69 ], can be used to shed light on the tensions case managers experience in their work. Accountability refers to whom case managers answer to and for what obligations [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings show how the three lenses of professional practice context analyses, namely, accountability, ethics, and professional-as-worker [ 69 ], can be used to shed light on the tensions case managers experience in their work. Accountability refers to whom case managers answer to and for what obligations [ 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings show how the three lenses of professional practice context analyses, namely, accountability, ethics, and professional-as-worker [ 69 ], can be used to shed light on the tensions case managers experience in their work. Accountability refers to whom case managers answer to and for what obligations [ 69 ]. Indeed, as professionals, through their licensing bodies, case managers are accountable to the State to ensure the quality of the services, but also to their employer, service funders, clients and families, and colleagues [ 70 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a recent study conducted with Canadian occupational therapists, VanderKaay, Letts, Jung, and Moll (2018) found that therapists sometimes exercised discretion in ways that countered policy and system guidelines and put them at risk for employment termination or being reported to regulatory bodies. Other literature illustrates how critical and theory-informed reflexivity, which can be considered a part of the discretionary process, helps practitioners negotiate tensions between professional ethics and organizational mandates, mediate policies, and make choices within contemporary health care systems (Freeman, & Jauvin, 2019; Mackey, 2014). In general, studies of occupational therapists’ discretion are much less common than studies of reasoning processes and the outcomes of those processes, pointing to a need to further investigate if and how discretion relates to policy and system perpetuation or transformation.…”
Section: Argument and Critical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%