2021
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the outcomes of skeletal trauma within a forensic population: Potential issues and implications in inferential modeling of blunt force trauma

Abstract: Injuries caused by blunt force trauma (BFT) are frequently assessed by forensic practitioners in daily casework [1,2]. Often, the circumstances of BFT injuries are not well known and in some cases indeterminate. As BFT skeletal trauma is one of the most frequent types of injuries encountered in forensic contexts [2], attention to the detail of how these injuries are interpreted is essential. Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While circumstances of death were described for the NMDID cases, pathology, and police reports were not available. Cases were retained using the same criteria in a previous study by Dempsey et al [33], where there was no statistical disagreement between the VIFM and NMDID data sources (in relation to trauma percentage and fragmentation). Although two data sources for PMCT data were used, all VIFM/NMDID data were pooled together for the research to increase the overall sample number.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While circumstances of death were described for the NMDID cases, pathology, and police reports were not available. Cases were retained using the same criteria in a previous study by Dempsey et al [33], where there was no statistical disagreement between the VIFM and NMDID data sources (in relation to trauma percentage and fragmentation). Although two data sources for PMCT data were used, all VIFM/NMDID data were pooled together for the research to increase the overall sample number.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%