1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00204067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the market of works of contemporary fine arts: An exploratory study

Abstract: In this study a simple economic model is developed for analyzing the market of works of contemporary fine arts(l). So far only a few authors(2) have tried to analyze supply of and the demand for works of fine arts in the literature. Moreover, in most of these studies only particular aspects are investigated, and the interaction between both sides of the market are rarely analyzed. The main argument put forward for this neglect is that the market for fine arts is something very special, because of the character… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schneider and Pommerehne (1983) were the first to use CKK reputation points as a proxy for the aesthetic valuation of artworks. With regressions for the years 1971-1978 they found that aesthetic value has a significant influence on the price of artworks.…”
Section: Previous Uses Of the Capital Kunstkompassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schneider and Pommerehne (1983) were the first to use CKK reputation points as a proxy for the aesthetic valuation of artworks. With regressions for the years 1971-1978 they found that aesthetic value has a significant influence on the price of artworks.…”
Section: Previous Uses Of the Capital Kunstkompassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work of Schneider and Pommerehne (1983) on contemporary fi ne arts describes some assumpti ons regarding the market. For example, the art market is competi ti ve only to some degree.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E.g. Matsusaka (1995) orRueben (1999) for general government expenditure, orSanterre (1989; for public education expenditures.6 See e.g Schneider and Pommerehne (1983). andFeld and Kirchgässner (1999) for general government expenditures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%