Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2018
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2018.707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing the Instability of the Core Components of Software Projects

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors analyze the stability of changes in classes using change proneness measures (i.e., a priori estimation) and instability measures (i.e., a posteriori measures). An extension of the aforementioned work has been done by Arvanitou et al (2017), where the authors propose a method for assessing change proneness in classes due to evolving requirements, bug fixing, and ripple effect.…”
Section: Software Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors analyze the stability of changes in classes using change proneness measures (i.e., a priori estimation) and instability measures (i.e., a posteriori measures). An extension of the aforementioned work has been done by Arvanitou et al (2017), where the authors propose a method for assessing change proneness in classes due to evolving requirements, bug fixing, and ripple effect.…”
Section: Software Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding software instability, Santos et al (2017) investigate the instability based on afferent and efferent coupling metrics in OSS projects, and performed and statistical analysis of the results observing that 48% of software product had a high instability. In addition, Aversano et al (2018) analyzed the instability of architecture core components across releases and they defined instability metrics based on the packages that are added, removed, or changed. Salama and Bahsoon (2017) study the architectural stability of self-adaptive systems to achieve stable adaptations, and where instability can be considered an indicator of the sustainability of the system and architecture as well.…”
Section: Software Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation