Analyzing the Impact of Different Bonding Protocol Strategies to Improve the Fracture Resistance of Uncomplicated Crown Fractures on Tooth Fracture Reattachment in Permanent Anterior Teeth: An In-vitro Study

Abstract

This study aims to analyze three different bonding protocol strategies in determining the fracture resistance on the reattachment of fragments in permanent anterior teeth. MethodologyThis study evaluated the ability of three bonding methods (Group A, total-etch technique; Group B, selective-etch technique; and Group C, self-etch technique) to enhance the fracture resistance of reattached tooth fragments. Sixty permanent maxillary central incisors were chosen, segmented at 3 mm from the incisal edge, and randomly distributed among the three groups. Tooth fragments were stored for 24 hours in GC Tooth Mousse (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and then reattachment was done using respective bonding techniques. Fracture resistance was gauged using a universal testing machine. ResultsThe mean fracture resistance values were as follows: total-etch (419.5995 N), selective-etch (359.1448 N), and self-etch (192.0887 N). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey tests revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups. It was inferred that the total-etch technique exhibited the highest fracture resistance, while the self-etch technique resulted in the lowest fracture resistance (P < 0.05). ConclusionsThe choice of bonding technique for reattaching tooth fragments should be made based on clinical context and patient needs. Total-etch provided the highest fracture resistance, but selective etch can be preferred for anterior teeth with lower occlusal loads to prevent sensitivity. The self-etch technique may not provide sufficient strength and should be used cautiously. More clinical studies are required to validate these findings and guide clinical decision-making in traumatic dental injury management.