Analyzing the evidence of an IPR take-off in China and India

Godinho, Manuel Mira; Ferreira, Vitor

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.009

Cited by 54 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 36 publications

(36 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, there are a group of studies that use patent citation data to analyze knowledge networks, such as those between 'innovation participants' in a particular industry (or technology), or networks between industries (or technologies) (Hung and Tang, 2008;Subramanian et al, 2011). Representative studies focus on analyzing networks between scientists and technicians, who are the innovation participants (Hung and Tang, 2008), or knowledge flows between technologically developed and under-developed countries (Godinho and Ferreira, 2012) in the context of particular industries (or technologies). The second group of studies focuses on monitoring technologies, with the objective of either to verify the discontinuous technological changes using the bibliometric data in patents or to derive emerging patterns of such changes (Paci et al, 1997).…”

Section: Innovation Studies Using Patent Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO

Kim

Lee

2015

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

150

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Innovation Studies Using Patent Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO

Kim

Lee

2015

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

150

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…There is no consensus on the impact of the new IP regime on the innovation climate in the Indian pharmaceutical industry; while some suggest that the impact has been positive, 20,21 others argue that the impact has been negative or insignificant. 22,23 Still others argue that the jury is still out as interesting firm responses in terms of innovation can be seen.…”

Section: Changes In the Ip Regime And Ip Policy Innovationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intellectual property protection in India and implications for health innovation: emerging perspectives

Basant¹,

Srinivasan²

2016

IEH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper undertakes a review of available studies to provide a perspective on the role of intellectual property (IP) protection in developing health care innovations in India. The relevant literature in the context of India has followed two strands: some studies focus on the implications of the new IP regime on access to health care, while others explore the implications of IP on innovation in general and medical innovation in particular. We argue that while it is not possible to attribute all types of innovations to changes in the IP regime, there is merit in viewing health care access and innovation as complementary and not dichotomous processes. We explore this relationship by discussing innovations undertaken by the Indian pharmaceutical industry and in health policy to balance the twin goals of invention and affordable health care.

show abstract

“…Hence, PCT patent applications are standardized worldwide with regard to different aspects, such as formal requirements and a high-quality international search. Consequently, PCT applications provide a high comparability among different countries and are frequently used in international analyses (e.g., Criscuolo and Verspagen 2008;Godinho and Ferreira 2012). As a further check of robustness, we include the number of patent families per university.…”

Section: Dependent Variablementioning

confidence: 99%

University patenting: a comparison of 300 leading universities worldwide

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite a worldwide increase in university patenting, empirical studies have largely focused on analyzing university patenting in individual countries and regions. We provide analyses from an international perspective, examining patents at the top 300 universities worldwide. By providing a patent ranking system and an analysis of the determinants of university patenting, we enable an international comparison not only between different countries but also between universities within countries. A ranking of the top-patenting universities shows a huge predominance of US universities: 18 of the top 25 universities are located in the US, with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology being ranked first. Our results show that the propensity to apply for patents is very high among US and Asian universities, while European universities lag behind. In addition to the home country, further determinants of university patenting are the quantity of the universities' publications and a technological focus in areas such as chemistry and mechanical engineering. However, the size of a university and the quality of its publications are not found to be significant determinants.

show abstract

Analyzing the evidence of an IPR take-off in China and India

Cited by 54 publications

References 36 publications

Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO

Patent databases for innovation studies: A comparative analysis of USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO

Intellectual property protection in India and implications for health innovation: emerging perspectives

University patenting: a comparison of 300 leading universities worldwide

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About