2022
DOI: 10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Public Concern Responsesfor Formulating Ordinances and Lawsusing Sentiment Analysis through VADER Application

Abstract: Purpose–Thispaperaimed to develop a system that applies VADER Sentiment Analysis to tweets collected using adevelopedtwitter scraper toolto identify the insights of public responsesbased on their tweetson certain government servicesrendered to them thus providing legislators of the province of Laguna an additional tool in writing future legislations.Method–This study may serve as an additional tool tothe Sangguniang Panlalawigan of Laguna in identifying sentiments of the pu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VADER is an improvement upon earlier lexicon‐based methods of assessing sentiments, such as Linguistic Enquiry and Word count (LIWC), in that it incorporates a set of rules regarding word sequence, negation, punctuation, and other factors that are commonly used to add emphasis or otherwise augment or diminish the sentiment of phrases. It is also popular among information and social science researchers (Bose et al, 2021; Cruz & Balahadia, 2022; Pano & Kashef, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VADER is an improvement upon earlier lexicon‐based methods of assessing sentiments, such as Linguistic Enquiry and Word count (LIWC), in that it incorporates a set of rules regarding word sequence, negation, punctuation, and other factors that are commonly used to add emphasis or otherwise augment or diminish the sentiment of phrases. It is also popular among information and social science researchers (Bose et al, 2021; Cruz & Balahadia, 2022; Pano & Kashef, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%