Analyzing Political Polarization on Social Media by Deleting Bot Spamming

Abstract

Social media platforms are part of everyday life, allowing the interconnection of people around the world in large discussion groups relating to every topic, including important social or political issues. Therefore, social media have become a valuable source of information-rich data, commonly referred to as Social Big Data, effectively exploitable to study the behavior of people, their opinions, moods, interests and activities. However, these powerful communication platforms can be also used to manipulate conversation, polluting online content and altering the popularity of users, through spamming activities and misinformation spreading. Recent studies have shown the use on social media of automatic entities, defined as social bots, that appear as legitimate users by imitating human behavior aimed at influencing discussions of any kind, including political issues. In this paper we present a new methodology, namely TIMBRE (Time-aware opInion Mining via Bot REmoval), aimed at discovering the polarity of social media users during election campaigns characterized by the rivalry of political factions. This methodology is temporally aware and relies on a keyword-based classification of posts and users. Moreover, it recognizes and filters out data produced by social media bots, which aim to alter public opinion about political candidates, thus avoiding heavily biased information. The proposed methodology has been applied to a case study that analyzes the polarization of a large number of Twitter users during the 2016 US presidential election. The achieved results show the benefits brought by both removing bots and taking into account temporal aspects in the forecasting process, revealing the high accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed approach. Finally, we investigated how the presence of social bots may affect political discussion by studying the 2016 US presidential election. Specifically, we analyzed the main differences between human and artificial political support, estimating also the influence of social bots on legitimate users.

(Re)shaping online narratives: when bots promote the message of President Trump during his first impeachment

“…Since social media platforms are key drivers of traffic towards far-right websites (together with search engines) ( Chen et al, 2022 ), it is important to note that many of the links towards such websites are made available to the public through bots. Although our findings may point to the automatic removal of bots from political debates as a possible intervention ( Cantini et al, 2022 ), there is evidence that attempts at moderating content can lead to even greater polarization ( Trujillo & Cresci, 2022 ), hence the need for caution when intervening.…”

Asessing the Accuracy of Google Trends for Predicting Presidential Elections: The Case of Chile 2006-2021

“…Cantini et al manage to demonstrate the analytical value for electoral climates from social network data in an effective way, as long as they manage to clean from the interactions agents that muddy the discussion or manage to remove concepts that confuse the object of search: voting intention and information about electoral options. (Cantini et al, 2022). Skoric et al review predictive studies using social network data to predict elections and indicate that the highest accuracy is achieved with machine-learning methods using time series data.…”

Bibliometric Review of Research on Misinformation: Reflective Analysis on the Future of Communication

“…Further, a study by Allcott and Gentzkow (2017) reported that 20% of the respondents recalled seeing fake news stories before the election campaign of 2016. However, Cantini et al (2022) discussed how the existence of social bots appears legitimate to social media users. These social bots were too effective in manipulating information and could work to influence public opinion.…”