2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13278-017-0479-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing polarization of social media users and news sites during political campaigns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social media, especially Twitter, is often discussed in terms of its potential for facilitating the discursive isolation of users (Garrett, Carnahan, & Lynch, 2011;Hong & Kim, 2016;Morales, Borondo, Losada, & Benito, 2015). As individuals create communication networks on Twitter with those who share similar beliefs, it has been argued that social media significantly contributes to the polarization of public opinion (Bail et al, 2018;Marozzo & Bessi, 2017). Context, however, matters: communicative separation may occur for certain topics, while no significant differences may be traced in other issues (Barberá, Jost, Nagler, Tucker, & Bonneau, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social media, especially Twitter, is often discussed in terms of its potential for facilitating the discursive isolation of users (Garrett, Carnahan, & Lynch, 2011;Hong & Kim, 2016;Morales, Borondo, Losada, & Benito, 2015). As individuals create communication networks on Twitter with those who share similar beliefs, it has been argued that social media significantly contributes to the polarization of public opinion (Bail et al, 2018;Marozzo & Bessi, 2017). Context, however, matters: communicative separation may occur for certain topics, while no significant differences may be traced in other issues (Barberá, Jost, Nagler, Tucker, & Bonneau, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the German Federal Elections, various other major political events have been closely monitored using quantitative approaches, including the US Presidential Elections (2008) (Malouf & Mullen, ), the Arab Spring in Egypt (2011) (Boecking, Hall, & Schneider, ), the General Elections in Belgium (2011) (De Fortuny, De Smedt, Martens, & Daelemans, ), the Presidential Ballot in France (2011) (Ceron, Curini, Iacus, & Porro, ), the Independence Referendum in Scotland (2014) (Wagner, ), the Brexit referendum (2016) (Hurlimann et al, ), and the constitutional referendum in Italy (2016) (Marozzo & Bessi, )—to name just a few.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tweets User engagement To access Twitter users' engagement with e-cigarette companies' tweets, the number of likes and retweets were measured. Although number of likes and retweets may be somewhat different from individuals' self-reported attitude toward social media content, the two variables have been widely used as a proxy of social media users' levels of engagement in studies that examined Tweets (e.g., Chung & Yoon, 2013;Marozzo & Bessi, 2018). Researchers have pointed out that Twitter users are more likely to retweet others' tweets when they find the tweets interesting (Stieglitz & Dang-Xuan, 2013).…”
Section: Companymentioning
confidence: 99%