2016
DOI: 10.17528/cifor/006107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing multilevel governance in Peru: Lessons for REDD+ from the study of land-use change and benefit sharing in Madre de Dios, Ucayali and San Martin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, they have created their own multi‐level institutional space known as the national and regional “Indigenous REDD+ roundtables.” These roundtables represented the space to bring Indigenous socio‐cultural diversity existing at multiple scales and to balance power within the multi‐scalar network of IPOs. They serves as spaces for sharing information, coordinating, self‐reflecting on the risks and opportunities of REDD+, resolving differences and frictions concerning REDD+ risks and benefits and developing the strategy development toward the recognition of Indigenous rights within the REDD+ framework (Kowler et al, 2016). At the same time, they have been active in the multi‐scalar political arena through joining diverse platforms and decision‐making processes that allowed them meaningful interaction, placed their aspirations on agendas at different political spheres and infused national REDD+ policies and plans with their socio‐political priorities.…”
Section: The Governance Of Redd+: a Socio‐political Space For Indigen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, they have created their own multi‐level institutional space known as the national and regional “Indigenous REDD+ roundtables.” These roundtables represented the space to bring Indigenous socio‐cultural diversity existing at multiple scales and to balance power within the multi‐scalar network of IPOs. They serves as spaces for sharing information, coordinating, self‐reflecting on the risks and opportunities of REDD+, resolving differences and frictions concerning REDD+ risks and benefits and developing the strategy development toward the recognition of Indigenous rights within the REDD+ framework (Kowler et al, 2016). At the same time, they have been active in the multi‐scalar political arena through joining diverse platforms and decision‐making processes that allowed them meaningful interaction, placed their aspirations on agendas at different political spheres and infused national REDD+ policies and plans with their socio‐political priorities.…”
Section: The Governance Of Redd+: a Socio‐political Space For Indigen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While extended research on Peru's REDD+ covers the forest governance system (Kowler et al, 2016; Robiglio et al, 2014), only a few studies engage with the involvement of Indigenous Peoples and their organizations (Dupuits & Cronkleton, 2020; White, 2014). This paper examines, for the period 2008–2019, the multi‐scalar socio‐political dynamics and negotiations between the State and Indigenous Peoples' Organizations (IPOs) underlying the tailoring of REDD+ institutional framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation