49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2010.5717450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Local Field Potentials in the healthy basal ganglia under Deep Brain Stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that bursting pattern, that have been studied for a long time in the STN and other basal ganglia (i.e. [21]–[25]), are not uniformly distributed, and confirm the hypothesis that β-oscillatory activity is seen largely within the dorsolateral portion of the STN [4], the same location that seems to provide optimal therapeutic benefit to patient undergoing STN DBS. Therefore, the predominance of tremor and β-band oscillations detected in the dorsal STN, confirms the spatial pattern of neuronal oscillatory frequency distribution within the STN [1][3].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…These results suggest that bursting pattern, that have been studied for a long time in the STN and other basal ganglia (i.e. [21]–[25]), are not uniformly distributed, and confirm the hypothesis that β-oscillatory activity is seen largely within the dorsolateral portion of the STN [4], the same location that seems to provide optimal therapeutic benefit to patient undergoing STN DBS. Therefore, the predominance of tremor and β-band oscillations detected in the dorsal STN, confirms the spatial pattern of neuronal oscillatory frequency distribution within the STN [1][3].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Finally, a third body of work has specifically pursued data-driven predictive modeling of the brain's response to neurostimulation. Multiple studies have used linear autoregressive models to fit the neural activity triggered by neurostimulation [28][29][30][31] while others have opted for nonlinear kernel-based autoregressive modeling 32,33 . However, these works have mainly focused on univariate modeling (i.e., modeling the neurostimulation-evoked response at a single measurement source), while modeling the evoked network response has remained more challenging [34][35][36] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%