Proceedings of the 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/k16-1013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Learner Understanding of Novel L2 Vocabulary

Abstract: In this work, we explore how learners can infer second-language noun meanings in the context of their native language. Motivated by an interest in building interactive tools for language learning, we collect data on three word-guessing tasks, analyze their difficulty, and explore the types of errors that novice learners make. We train a log-linear model for predicting our subjects' guesses of word meanings in varying kinds of contexts. The model's predictions correlate well with subject performance, and we pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Labutov and Lipson (2014) carry out experiments to determine the guessability of a word in code switched text. A similar work by Knowles et al (2016) discuss the factors that can potentially affect the guessability of a German word with English context. We extend these works to model acquisition in multiple languages: English-Spanish, Spanish-English and French-English.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labutov and Lipson (2014) carry out experiments to determine the guessability of a word in code switched text. A similar work by Knowles et al (2016) discuss the factors that can potentially affect the guessability of a German word with English context. We extend these works to model acquisition in multiple languages: English-Spanish, Spanish-English and French-English.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…into their model to rank search results by their reading level. Although not directly about ARA, Knowles et al (2016) explored the relationship between a word comprehension and a learner's native language. However, though ARA approaches are meant to be for real users in most of the cases, we don't see much work on modeling user features in relation to ARA.…”
Section: Readability Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decoding methods. While greedy decoding and beam search are popular strategies for sequenceto-sequence tasks, such as machine translation, Knowles et al (2016) and Stahlberg and Byrne (2019) showed that searching for the most probable sentence in a model trained with likelihood maximization has a bias for short sentences. In open-ended generation, Fan et al (2018) and Holtzman et al (2018Holtzman et al ( , 2019 have shown that these methods lead to repetitions and dull text.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%