Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: A review

Abstract

International audienceThe study of mass and energy transfer across landscapes has recently evolved to comprehensive considerations acknowledging the role of biota and humans as geomorphic agents, as well as the importance of small-scale landscape features. A contributing and supporting factor to this evolution is the emergence over the last two decades of technologies able to acquire high resolution topography (HRT) (meter and sub-meter resolution) data. Landscape features can now be captured at an appropriately fine spatial resolution at which surface processes operate; this has revolutionized the way we study Earth-surface processes. The wealth of information contained in HRT also presents considerable challenges. For example, selection of the most appropriate type of HRT data for a given application is not trivial. No definitive approach exists for identifying and filtering erroneous or unwanted data, yet inappropriate filtering can create artifacts or eliminate/distort critical features. Estimates of errors and uncertainty are often poorly defined and typically fail to represent the spatial heterogeneity of the dataset, which may introduce bias or error for many analyses. For ease of use, gridded products are typically preferred rather than the more information-rich point cloud representations. Thus many users take advantage of only a fraction of the available data, which has furthermore been subjected to a series of operations often not known or investigated by the user. Lastly, standard HRT analysis work-flows are yet to be established for many popular HRT operations, which has contributed to the limited use of point cloud data.In this review, we identify key research questions relevant to the Earth-surface processes community within the theme of mass and energy transfer across landscapes and offer guidance on how to identify the most appropriate topographic data type for the analysis of interest. We describe the operations commonly performed from raw data to raster products and we identify key considerations and suggest appropriate work-flows for each, pointing to useful resources and available tools. Future research directions should stimulate further development of tools that take advantage of the wealth of information contained in the HRT data and address the present and upcoming research needs such as the ability to filter out unwanted data, compute spatially variable estimates of uncertainty and perform multi-scale analyses. While we focus primarily on HRT applications for mass and energy transfer, we envision this review to be relevant beyond the Earth-surface processes community for a much broader range of applications involving the analysis of HRT

Rapid surface-water volume estimations in beaver ponds

“…Measuring dam height in the field is quick and straight forward, but it can also be reasonably approximated with remotely sensed imagery alone using spectral-depth correlation methods (e.g. Passalacqua et al, 2015). If dam heights are available, we recommend using our median p coefficient (0.91) for beaver ponds in the equation presented by Brooks and Hayashi (2002):…”

A review of marine geomorphometry, the quantitative study of the seafloor

“…For instance, many of the issues and future challenges mentioned in this overview (e.g. uncertainty and error propagation and modelling, scale, change detection) have been discussed in recent reviews about terrestrial high-resolution topographic data and Earth surface processes (Tarolli, 2014;Passalacqua et al, 2015), highlighting the similarities in challenges and opportunities that marine and terrestrial geomorphometry are facing. Uniting efforts in geomorphometry will likely result in more effective research and development and facilitate the coupling with other disciplines, including different fields of marine sciences.…”

“…The BASE format allows multi-attributes surface models. CUBE's main inconvenience is that it requires a lot of ancillary data to be collected in order to compute TPU, but it is very reliable in defining the spatial pattern of errors, their importance, and helping to identify their sources (Passalacqua et al, 2015). In addition to the bathymetry, a map of uncertainty can be computed, which can become very important when making decisions using the bathymetry and for onward geomorphometric analysis.…”

“…When the artefacts are large they dominate the surface and cannot be removed with traditional filtering methods (e.g. Gaussian filtering) as this considerably affects the overall quality of the surface (Passalacqua et al, 2015), and the artefacts are also difficult to overcome when deriving terrain attributes even by using multi-scale methods (Sect. 5.1).…”

Unravelling earth flow dynamics with 3-D time series derived from UAV-SfM models

“…Measurements of surface deformation can be retrieved from chronological sequences of sub-metre resolution topography. The choice of the acquisition framework for topographic representations will always result from the trade-off between (1) the spatial resolution needed and (2) the extent of the study area (Passalacqua et al, 2015). In the specific case of repeated measurements of mass movement and hillslope processes in mountainous environments, the following three parameters are narrowing down the possibilities for the acquisition framework: (3) the surveying cost, (4) the necessary return period for proper monitoring, and (5) the accessibility of the study area.…”