2020
DOI: 10.1145/3404994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing Genetic Testing Discourse on the Web Through the Lens of Twitter, Reddit, and 4chan

Abstract: Recent progress in genomics has enabled the emergence of a flourishing market for direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. Companies like 23andMe and AncestryDNA provide affordable health, genealogy, and ancestry reports, and have already tested tens of millions of customers. Consequently, news, experiences, and views on genetic testing are increasingly shared and discussed on social media. At the same time, far-right groups have also taken an interest in genetic testing, using them to attack minorities and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classifier provides the probability of a comment being toxic, defined as "a rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is likely to make people leave a discussion" (Wulczyn, Thain, and Dixon 2017). The Perspective classifier has been used in prior Reddit studies (Mittos et al 2020;Xia et al 2020). Research evaluating its performance on comments from political communities shows that, on average, its toxicity classification is comparable to a single human judgment of toxicity (Rajadesingan, Resnick, and Budak 2020).…”
Section: Quantifying Toxicity Of Repliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classifier provides the probability of a comment being toxic, defined as "a rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is likely to make people leave a discussion" (Wulczyn, Thain, and Dixon 2017). The Perspective classifier has been used in prior Reddit studies (Mittos et al 2020;Xia et al 2020). Research evaluating its performance on comments from political communities shows that, on average, its toxicity classification is comparable to a single human judgment of toxicity (Rajadesingan, Resnick, and Budak 2020).…”
Section: Quantifying Toxicity Of Repliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classifier provides the probability of a comment being toxic, defined as "a rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is likely to make people leave a discussion" (Wulczyn, Thain, and Dixon 2017). The Perspective classifier has been used in prior Reddit studies (Mittos et al 2020;Xia et al 2020). Research evaluating its performance on comments from political communities shows that, on average, its toxicity classification is comparable to a single human judgment of toxicity (Rajadesingan, Resnick, and Budak 2020).…”
Section: Quantifying Toxicity Of Repliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posts made within each subreddit must adhere to these guidelines or offending users may be banned from future posting or commenting in the subreddit. Due to the more relaxed moderation rules on the platform, especially surrounding controversial topics, Reddit threads commonly contain toxic, harassing, or explicit commentary [22]. A distinct difference that separates Reddit from Twitter or Facebook is how communities form.…”
Section: John Wilkes Boothmentioning
confidence: 99%