2017 8th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems &Amp; Applications (IISA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iisa.2017.8316445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing facts and opinions in Nepali subjective texts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…179 for positive and 205 for negative, and MNB outperformed other methods. Over few years, several research (Piryani et al, 2020;Regmi et al, 2017;Tamrakar et al, 2020) have been conducted using traditional machine learning and deep learning models for Nepali sentiment classification.…”
Section: Text Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…179 for positive and 205 for negative, and MNB outperformed other methods. Over few years, several research (Piryani et al, 2020;Regmi et al, 2017;Tamrakar et al, 2020) have been conducted using traditional machine learning and deep learning models for Nepali sentiment classification.…”
Section: Text Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of traditional machine learning algorithms and deep learning models have been trained to perform text classification tasks in Nepali, mostly news group classification (Basnet & Timalsina, 2018;Kafle, Sharma, Subedi, & Timalsina, 2016;Koirala & Niraula, 2021;T.B. Shahi & Pant, 2018;Singh, 2018;Subba, Paudel, & Shahi, 2019;Thakur & Singh, 2014;Wagle & Thapa, 2021) and sentiment analysis (Piryani, Piryani, Singh, & Pinto, 2020;Regmi, Bal, & Kultsova, 2017;T. Shahi, Sitaula, & Paudel, 2022;Sitaula, Basnet, Mainali, & Shahi, 2021;Tamrakar, Bal, & Thapa, 2020;Thapa & Bal, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%