Analyzing Enterprise Architecture in National Governments: The Cases of Denmark and the Netherlands

Janssen, Marijn; Hjort-Madsen, Kristian

doi:10.1109/hicss.2007.79

Cited by 71 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 9 publications

(10 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The stages of this research can be seen in Figure 1. To compare GEA, some use the comparative approach based policies, actors and structures, governance, architecture frameworks and methodologies, principles and standads architecture, implementations [3]. Each method of comparison is made according to the needs.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Weighted Components of i-Government Enterprise Architecture

Budiardjo

Firmansyah

Hasibuan

2017

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Lack of government performance, among others due to the lack of coordination and communication among government agencies. Whilst, Enterprise Architecture (EA) in the government can be use as a strategic planning tool to improve productivity, efficiency, and effectivity. However, the existence components of Government Enterprise Architecture (GEA) do not show level of importance, that cause difficulty in implementing good e-government for good governance. This study is to explore the weight of GEA components using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in order to discovered an inherent structure of e-government. The results show that IT governance component of GEA play a major role in the GEA. The rest of components that consist of e-government system, e-government regulation, e-government management, and application key operational, contributed more or less the same. Beside that GEA from other countries analyzes using comparative base on comon enterprise architecture component. These weighted components use to construct i-Government enterprise architecture. and show the relative importance of component in order to established priorities in developing e-government.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Jassen [3] at GEA research in Denmark and the Netherlands noted that the GEA can provide guidance in the development of e-government. GEA implementation will reduce costs as well as the development of e-government can ensure its development as needed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Weighted Components of i-Government Enterprise Architecture

Budiardjo

Firmansyah

Hasibuan

2017

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the public sector, Janssen and Hjort-Madsen [32] proposed a framework on national enterprise architecture (NEA) and used it to compare the implementation processes of Denmark and the Netherlands. This was one of the first attempts that highlighted the importance of EA by comparing two different nations' EA strategies, but it had limitations in analyzing the ultimate goals and performance of EA.…”

Section: Literature Review Of Ea Success Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamics of Enterprise Architecture in the Korean Public Sector: Transformational Change vs. Transactional Change

Nam

Oh²,

Kim

et al. 2016

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Enterprise architecture (EA) is one of the most important tools for implementing e-government effectively and delivering high-quality information technology services to citizens. To develop a robust EA research model with key success factors, we apply the theory of organizational change proposed by Burke and Litwin, using the concepts of transformational and transactional change. The analysis is conducted by using South Korea's EA project launched in 2003. This study classifies EA implementation in the South Korean public sector into three stages and explains the characteristics of each stage from the organizational change perspective. We raise the issue of EA application level compounded by the problem of diverse EA definitions and discuss the difficulties of EA implementation based on the framework of organizational change. In addition, 20 EA experts are surveyed to confirm the findings of this study. Finally, we propose a new research model for future empirical study based on the presented findings. We believe that this study, as an in-depth review of EA implementation from an organizational change perspective, will benefit EA experts from a practical point of view, as well as academics from a research perspective.

show abstract

“…Current efforts are focused on coordinating the projects and providing a framework that will function as an umbrella for explaining the relationships among the projects. These kinds of frameworks are often denoted as national enterprise architecture (NEA); see, for example, Janssen and Madsen (2007). The Norwegian government has also defined a common ICT-architecture (Report to the Storting no.17: 2006-07).…”

Section: What Is An Ict Architecture For the Public Sector?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One common component in many of these strategies is to build a common ICT-architecture as a framework for their eGovernment solutions (see e.g. Janssen andHjort-Madsen 2007, Liimatainen 2008). However, such efforts imply technical, as well as organizational and, not least, legal challenges.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Develop an Open and Flexible Information Infrastructure for the Public Sector?

Hornnes¹,

Jansen

Langeland³

2010

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. In line with a number of other countries, Norway has decided to base their ICT solutions in the public sector on a common ICT architecture. This article discusses some challenges related to this work. The theoretical basis for the discussions is our understanding of information infrastructures, which we claim offers a fruitful perspective to the building of ICT architectures. Of particular relevance is its installed base: the history of technical and non-technical components that determines its further development. We argue that an ICT architecture for the public sector should be seen as an important element of a government information infrastructure. However, it has to be adapted to other principles and fulfil a wider range of needs than traditional types of infrastructures, including the specific political, regulatory and organizational context that it targets

show abstract

Analyzing Enterprise Architecture in National Governments: The Cases of Denmark and the Netherlands

Abstract: National enterprise architectures (NEA)

Cited by 71 publications

References 9 publications

Weighted Components of i-Government Enterprise Architecture

Weighted Components of i-Government Enterprise Architecture

Dynamics of Enterprise Architecture in the Korean Public Sector: Transformational Change vs. Transactional Change

How to Develop an Open and Flexible Information Infrastructure for the Public Sector?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About