“…Each political concept has its emotional dimension (friendship and enmity, war and peace, justice and crime, nationalism and cosmopolitanism, security and insecurity, etc.). Arguably, "visuality might have a specific power through its affective, mimetic, immediate, and performative qualities," 51 particularly when it comes to the study of postmaterialist politics of identity, from celebrity performances to electoral rallies. This type of "power of affect" operates as an "assemblage of techniques and technologies of affective event amplification through which the cultural and corporeal logics of intervention come to resonate emotionally."…”
Section: … and Three Theoretical Componentsmentioning
The article introduces the concept of visual biopolitics as a new research approach to studying politics. The analysis starts with a discussion of how visualization might be helpful for political analysis and continues with academic engagement with semiotic studies, along with the theories of aesthetic and mimetic representation and performativity. Then the author explains how visuals can trigger political debates, particularly in the sphere of biopolitics and biopower, as well as in the adjacent domains of sovereignty, governmentality, and border politics. The concluding section projects the visual biopolitics frame onto the field of illiberal studies.
“…Each political concept has its emotional dimension (friendship and enmity, war and peace, justice and crime, nationalism and cosmopolitanism, security and insecurity, etc.). Arguably, "visuality might have a specific power through its affective, mimetic, immediate, and performative qualities," 51 particularly when it comes to the study of postmaterialist politics of identity, from celebrity performances to electoral rallies. This type of "power of affect" operates as an "assemblage of techniques and technologies of affective event amplification through which the cultural and corporeal logics of intervention come to resonate emotionally."…”
Section: … and Three Theoretical Componentsmentioning
The article introduces the concept of visual biopolitics as a new research approach to studying politics. The analysis starts with a discussion of how visualization might be helpful for political analysis and continues with academic engagement with semiotic studies, along with the theories of aesthetic and mimetic representation and performativity. Then the author explains how visuals can trigger political debates, particularly in the sphere of biopolitics and biopower, as well as in the adjacent domains of sovereignty, governmentality, and border politics. The concluding section projects the visual biopolitics frame onto the field of illiberal studies.
“…In terms of methodology, my interpretation of ZDT is informed by the film analytical approach of David Bordwell and its application to IR (Bordwell, 1985; Heck, 2017). In his book Making Meaning (1991), Bordwell distinguishes between two modes of analysis, i.e.…”
Section: Representing Torture In Zero Dark Thirtymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZDT is an ‘important contribution(s) to the public discourse in which the meanings of these events are negotiated’ (Heck, 2017: 366). As one critic wrote, ZDT ‘is an exercise in instant history and hot-after-the-fact mythmaking’ (Powers, 2013: 303).…”
Section: Representing Torture In Zero Dark Thirtymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZDT is a hybrid genre, including elements of a docudrama and action thriller. 5 So-called docudramas ‘set historical and political events “in scene”’ (Heck, 2017: 368) and reassemble first-hand accounts of real events with fictional elements. Like a typical Hollywood genre film, ZDT draws on news headlines and actual events between 2001 and 2012.…”
Section: Representing Torture In Zero Dark Thirtymentioning
The global war on terror (GWOT) is undoubtedly the most recent case where a government authorized ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’, a euphemism for torture. In addition to shocking stories and photographs from Guantánamo, Abu Ghraib and CIA black site prisons, popular culture assists in the production of torture’s public image and indicates a site of norm contestation. Therefore, the aim of this article is threefold. First, the author shows that Zero Dark Thirty (2012, dir. Kathryn Bigelow) is constitutive for the public image of torture and its meaning-in-use. Second, she argues that the film’s representation of torture works as a popular site of contesting the anti-torture norm. Finally, she reflects on the continuum between popular culture and the politics of torture.
“…Der Beitrag geht in drei Schritten vor. Zunächst werde ich einige methodologische Überlegungen einer Filmpolitologie zusammenfassen , Heck 2017 und mich auch auf Klassiker der Filmanalyse (Mikos 2015, Bienk 2014) beziehen. Hieraus entwickle ich eine pragmatische Heuristik, die meine eigene Analyse der Serie 24 anleitet.…”
VeepDas Amt des Vizepräsidenten der USA als institutionalisierte Bedeutungslosigkeit? | 285 Alexander Stock "Whatever it takes" 24 und die Normalisierung des Ausnahmezustandes | 305 Frank Gadinger 人民的名 人民的名 人民的名 人民的名义 义 义 义 (Im Namen des Volkes) versus House of Cards Polit-Serien als Legitimierungsinstrument aktueller chinesischer Reformpolitik | 327
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.