Analyzing Dental Implant Sites From Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans on a Tablet Computer

Carrasco, Alejandro; Jalali, Elnaz; Dhingra, Ajay; Lurie, Alan G.; Yadav, Sumit; Tadinada, Aditya

doi:10.1097/id.0000000000000595

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The following applications were used for image analysis in DICOM format on descriptive stations: OsiriX [ 13 , 15 ], eFilm [ 14 ] and CB-Works [ 16 ]. On mobile devices it was OsiriX mobile [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], mRay [ 17 , 19 ], Bone Ninja [ 18 ] or OsiriX via Pocket Cloud [ 16 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A total of 32 computed tomography examinations were subjected to such evaluation. Additionally, the subjective feelings of PACS and iPad users were assessed on the basis of a short questionnaire [ 16 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The region of interest (ROI) was the edentulous areas of the mandible and maxilla around the molars and premolars. The diagnostic quality of the devices was checked by the study participants by performing quantitative and qualitative measurements, other qualitative measures and the device resolution essential to determine pathology [ 16 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In terms of comfort of use, speed of viewing images and ease of manipulation, the iPad scored 4 points and PACS 5 points in each of the above-mentioned survey questions. According to the authors, the iPad is additionally distinguished by its competitive price, mobility and the possibility of intraoperative use, minimizing the risk of infections for the patient which provides additional support and facilitates the work of implantologists [ 16 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Usability of Mobile Solutions Intended for Diagnostic Images—A Systematic Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the growing popularity of mobile devices, they still have not found widespread use in medicine. This is due to the procedures in a given place, differences in the availability of mobile devices between individual institutions or lack of appropriate legal regulations and accreditation by relevant institutions. Numerous studies have been conducted and compared the usability of mobile solutions designed for diagnostic images evaluation on various mobile devices and applications with classic stationary descriptive stations. This study is an attempt to compare the usefulness of currently available mobile applications which are used in the medical industry, focusing on imaging diagnostics. As a consequence of the healthcare sector’s diversity, it is also not possible to design a universal mobile application, which results in a multitude of software available on the market and makes it difficult to reliably compile and compare studies included in this systematic review. Despite these differences, it was possible to identify both positive and negative features of portable methods analyzing radiological images. The mobile application of the golden mean in hospital infrastructure should be widely available, with convenient and simple usage. Our future research will focus on development in the use of mobile devices and applications in the medical sector.

show abstract