2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing connections between teacher and student topic-specific knowledge of lower secondary mathematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Socialization in the knowledge exchange process transforms tacit knowledge through social interactions, such as students' meetings outside the traditional classroom settings (Nonaka et al , 2000). It can also include intellectual interactions through which lecturers share their work-related and life-applicable experiences with students within and outside the classroom (Tchoshanov et al , 2017). Basically socialization is the exchange of tacit knowledge from a person who has it to another who desires to possess similar or the same kind of tacit knowledge (Zee et al , 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socialization in the knowledge exchange process transforms tacit knowledge through social interactions, such as students' meetings outside the traditional classroom settings (Nonaka et al , 2000). It can also include intellectual interactions through which lecturers share their work-related and life-applicable experiences with students within and outside the classroom (Tchoshanov et al , 2017). Basically socialization is the exchange of tacit knowledge from a person who has it to another who desires to possess similar or the same kind of tacit knowledge (Zee et al , 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the fact that mathematics teachers' knowledge considerably affected their instructional practices and student achievement [15]. Therefore, researchers have conducted various studies to enhance preservice and in-service mathematics teachers' knowledge [35], assess the level of their knowledge [37] and investigate the association between teacher knowledge, instructional methods, and student achievement [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed study consisted of two stages: 1) quantitative stage was used for the purpose of selection of teacher sample; 2) qualitative stage was applied to analyze teacher responses on a set of open-ended questions on the division of fractions. For the first stage, quantitative data from previous studies (Tchoshanov, 2011(Tchoshanov, , 2017a(Tchoshanov, , 2017b(Tchoshanov, , 2017c) was used to further zoom into qualitative analysis of unpacking shared approaches as well as to address contested areas in teachers' topic-specific content knowledge in the U.S. and Russia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%