2023
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing author collaborations by developing a follower-leader clustering algorithm and identifying top co-authoring countries: Cluster analysis

Abstract: Background: This study aimed to explore suitable clustering algorithms for author collaborations (ACs) in bibliometrics and investigate which countries frequently coauthored with others in recent years. To achieve this, the study developed a method called the Follower-Leading Clustering Algorithm (FLCA) and used it to analyze ACs and cowords in the Journal of Medicine (Baltimore) from 2020 to 2022. Methods: This study extracted article metadata from the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FLCA algorithm [54–67] is straightforward but needs refinement. Improvements could include giving precedence to individuals with higher WCD for maximum connection and incorporating a stop criterion for relationships within the AC network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FLCA algorithm [54–67] is straightforward but needs refinement. Improvements could include giving precedence to individuals with higher WCD for maximum connection and incorporating a stop criterion for relationships within the AC network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional bibliometrics, heavily relying on software like CiteSpace [35] and VOSview, [36] present cluttered results with numerous edges and nodes in networks (e.g., 26 Figures and 15 Tables in a bibliographical study [37] ), limiting structured layouts and concise cluster analysis. These drawbacks highlight the need for improvements that combine visuals, with the DDPP model, [11,12] and the FLCA algorithm [13,14] to enhance the quality and depth of SC research. Through which, overcoming these limitations would greatly contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of SC within the field of bibliometrics.…”
Section: Traditional Bibliometrics Versus Modern Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,8] Despite the availability of over 125,041 articles on SC indexed in PubMed, [9] traditional bibliometric methods have only been applied to a mere 6 documents. [10] The utilization of modern approaches such as the DDPP model (descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive analytics) [11,12] and the FLCA (follower-leading clustering algorithm) [13,14] in bibliographical studies has been limited in this context. It is challenging to explore author collaborations and article themes in SC research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The follower-leading cluster algorithm (FLCA) [44][45][46] was applied to classify clusters. A collaborative map with 4 quadrants (namely, emerging, niche, co-work (or co-word), and motor by nodes' edge degree and frequency degree, respectively, in network) was made in R programing language [47] generated on a R platform, [48] based on country-based author collaborations and keyword cooccurrences, respectively.…”
Section: Collaborative Map On Country-based Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One hundred top-cited articles related to schizophrenia in psychiatry (T100SCHIZ) [49] were extracted from the current study. Keywords Plus in WoS was used to cluster research domains using the FLCA, [44][45][46] as displayed in social network analysis (SNA). [50][51][52] Keywords with the highest weighted score in the respective cluster using SNA in the previous section would be assigned as the representative of the cluster.…”
Section: Collaborative Map On Country-based Authormentioning
confidence: 99%