2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10588-020-09307-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing and distinguishing fake and real news to mitigate the problem of disinformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fake news problem has been addressed by researchers from various perspectives related to different topics. These topics include, but are not restricted to, social science studies, which investigate why and who falls for fake news (Altay et al 2022;Batailler et al 2022;Sterret et al 2018;Badawy et al 2019;Weiss et al 2020;Guadagno and Guttieri 2021), whom to trust and how perceptions of misinformation and disinformation relate to media trust and media consumption patterns (Hameleers et al 2022), how fake news differs from personal lies (Chiu and Oh 2021;Escolà-Gascón 2021), examine how can the law regulate digital disinformation and how governments can regulate the values of social media companies that themselves regulate disinformation spread on their platforms (Marsden et al 2020;Schuyler 2019;Vasu et al 2018;Burshtein 2017;Waldman 2017;Alemanno 2018;Verstraete et al 2017), and argue the challenges to democracy (Jungherr and Schroeder 2021); Behavioral interventions studies, which examine what literacy ideas mean in the age of dis/ mis-and malinformation (Carmi et al 2020), investigate whether media literacy helps identification of fake news (Jones-Jang et al 2021) and attempt to improve people's news literacy (Apuke et al 2022;Dame Adjin-Tettey 2022;Nagel 2022;Jones-Jang et al 2021;Mihailidis and Viotty 2017;García et al 2020) by encouraging people to pause to assess credibility of headlines (Fazio 2020), promote civic online reasoning (McGrew 2020;McGrew et al 2018) and critical thinking (Lutzke et al 2019), together with evaluations of credibility indicators (Bhuiyan et al 2020;Nygren et al 2019;Sh...…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fake news problem has been addressed by researchers from various perspectives related to different topics. These topics include, but are not restricted to, social science studies, which investigate why and who falls for fake news (Altay et al 2022;Batailler et al 2022;Sterret et al 2018;Badawy et al 2019;Weiss et al 2020;Guadagno and Guttieri 2021), whom to trust and how perceptions of misinformation and disinformation relate to media trust and media consumption patterns (Hameleers et al 2022), how fake news differs from personal lies (Chiu and Oh 2021;Escolà-Gascón 2021), examine how can the law regulate digital disinformation and how governments can regulate the values of social media companies that themselves regulate disinformation spread on their platforms (Marsden et al 2020;Schuyler 2019;Vasu et al 2018;Burshtein 2017;Waldman 2017;Alemanno 2018;Verstraete et al 2017), and argue the challenges to democracy (Jungherr and Schroeder 2021); Behavioral interventions studies, which examine what literacy ideas mean in the age of dis/ mis-and malinformation (Carmi et al 2020), investigate whether media literacy helps identification of fake news (Jones-Jang et al 2021) and attempt to improve people's news literacy (Apuke et al 2022;Dame Adjin-Tettey 2022;Nagel 2022;Jones-Jang et al 2021;Mihailidis and Viotty 2017;García et al 2020) by encouraging people to pause to assess credibility of headlines (Fazio 2020), promote civic online reasoning (McGrew 2020;McGrew et al 2018) and critical thinking (Lutzke et al 2019), together with evaluations of credibility indicators (Bhuiyan et al 2020;Nygren et al 2019;Sh...…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model has achieved higher accuracy than other existing approaches to datasets. In 2020, Vereshchaka et al (2020) have solved the issue of predicting fake news by getting the socio-cultural and textual characteristics of fake news features and by analyzing and detecting fake news features. Further, data analytics was investigated for constructing a concordance of phase and word frequency.…”
Section: Existing Fake News Detection Model Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few fake news detection models use social context features (Shu et al 2019) for getting suitable features from the news content. N-gram (Vereshchaka et al 2020;Agarwal et al 2020;Saleh et al 2021;Kaliyar et al 2021b) generates words and characters from contents with several n-gram orders. Finally, the N-gram vectors are grouped for getting one feature vector for each information.…”
Section: Nlp Techniques Used In Fake News Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea of mass sharing with the consensus of the general public, despite thorough checking on the authenticity of the information, forms a false perception which makes the publication. Such information is usually disseminated clandestinely on social media platforms as an effort to obfuscate the truth and eventually, manipulate public opinion (Vereshchaka et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%