Analyzing and Assessing the Experience of Traveling by Public Transport

Schiefelbusch, Martin

doi:10.5038/2375-0901.18.4.4

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 40 publications

(36 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As will be elaborated upon later, there are also efforts to further develop or refine existing techniques from development banks, cooperative research organizations and NGOs. The literature also elaborates on the appraisal of user experiences and quality of service (Phillips and Guttenplan, 2003;Hawas et al, 2012;Olivková, 2015;Schiefelbusch, 2015;Godavarthy et al, 2015), the assessment of routes and networks (i.e. Banai, 2006), as well as the appraisal of maintenance investment (i.e.…”

Section: Assessment Methods From Around the World Potentially Useful mentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2017

JPT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Assessment Methods From Around the World Potentially Useful mentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2017

JPT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Also, (Aydin et al, 2015) identified welcoming as one of the most important attributes in evaluating customer satisfaction in rail transit service. (Redman et al, 2013), (Jain et al, 2014), (Keyvan-Ekbatani & Vaziri, 2012), (Güner, 2018), (Boujelbene & Derbel, 2015), (Barbosa et al, 2017), (Celik et al, 2013), (Calvo & Ferrer, 2018), (Nguyen-Phuoc, Su, Tran, Le, & Johnson, 2020), (Pedroso, Bermann, & Sanches-Pereira, 2018), (Camargo Pérez, Carrillo, & Montoya-Torres, 2014), (Eboli & Mazzulla, 2011), (Nassereddine & Eskandari, 2017), (J. de Oña, de Oña, & López, 2016), (Aydin et al, 2015), (Carreira et al, 2013) Comfort (Chou et al, 2014), (R. De Oña et al, 2014), (Zhang et al, 2019), (dell'Olio et al, 2011, (Nathanail, 2008), (Schiefelbusch, 2015), (Keyvan-Ekbatani & Vaziri, 2012), (Lee, 2018), (Pedroso et al, 2018), (Eboli & Mazzulla, 2015), (Mahmoud & Hine, 2016), (Barbosa et al, 2017), (Celik et al 2013), (Güner, 2018), (Redman et al, 2013), (Eboli & Mazzulla, 2011), (J. de Oña et al, 2016, (Aydin et al, 2015), (Sam et al 2018), (Carreira et al, 2013) Frequency (Redman et al, 2013), (Jain et al, 2014),…”

Section: Welcomingmentioning

confidence: 99%

A fuzzy Delphi analytic hierarchy model to rank factors influencing public transit mode choice: A case study

Ebrahimi

Bridgelall

2021

Research in Transportation Business & Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study applied a decision-based model with uncertainty to identify factors in mode choice and to rank their influence in attracting riders to available public transit modes in the city of Tehran. The model integrates a fuzzy Delphi method and a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with fuzzy set theory to process opinion uncertainties. The surveys found that from highest to lowest in influence, the service attribute rankings were safety, reliability, frequency, comfort, travel cost, information provision, and accessibility. Based on these attributes, subway ranked highest in passenger attraction potential, followed by ride-hailing, bus rapid transit, vans and taxis, then public bus services. These findings support the hypothesis that it is worthwhile for big cities to ramp investments in public transit improvements even as ride hailing services proliferate with the potential to attract users away from more throughput-efficient and lower-cost services.

show abstract

“…There are a few cases in which experience was not sufficient. It was used only in the analysis before planning procedures which is insufficient and should be used in all stages of transport planning [17]. Given that integration is a demanding task which depends on a range of elements that determine passenger behaviour, every change may cause non-sustainability of an element in the integration.…”

Section: Role Of Integrated Passenger Transportmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated Passenger Transport System in Rural Areas – A Literature Review

Maretić

Abramović

2020

PROMET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The planning and organisation of public passenger transport in rural areas is a complex process. The transport demand in rural areas is often low, which makes it hard to establish and run a financially sustainable public transport system. A solution is integrated passenger transport that eliminates deficiencies and provides benefits for all participants in the public passenger transport process. This paper describes the impact of integrated passenger transport on mobility in rural areas and critically evaluates different literature sources. Integration of passenger transport in urban areas has been described in the context of rural areas, and the challenges of integration of public passenger transport specific to rural areas have been analysed. Through the application in urban and rural areas, the planning of integrated and non-integrated passenger transport has been functionally analysed. The analysis found an increase in the degree of mobility in the areas that use integrated passenger transport compared to the non-integrated one. This research of the literature review has identified the rural areas of mobility as under-researched. The mobility research can set up a more efficient passenger transport planning system in rural areas.

show abstract

Analyzing and Assessing the Experience of Traveling by Public Transport

Abstract: Abstract

Cited by 8 publications

References 40 publications

Untitled

Untitled

A fuzzy Delphi analytic hierarchy model to rank factors influencing public transit mode choice: A case study

Integrated Passenger Transport System in Rural Areas – A Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About