2005
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.s_supplement.0158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyzing 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging units for implementation in radiosurgery

Abstract: The 3-tesla imaging unit showed superior anatomical contrast and resolution in comparison with the established 1-tesla and 1.5-tesla units; however, due to the high field strength the field within the head coil is very sensitive to inhomogeneities and therefore 3-tesla imaging data will have be handled with care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the latter can provide excellent differentiation between parenchymal tumor and normal brain tissue, its main disadvantage is geometric image distortions caused by nonhomogeneity of the static magnetic field, nonlinearity of the imaging gradients, or eddy currents around the stereotactic frame. Although these can be significantly reduced by the newest efficient magnet shim procedures combined with actively shielded gradient designs, object-induced distortions caused by susceptibility effects at tissue-air interfaces and chemical shift displacement of adipose tissue remain remarkable, especially at magnetic fields of higher strengths [3][4][5] . A study comparing the target position during localization of the subthalamic nucleus based on the data of 1.5-tesla MRI and its real position on the phantom inserted into the stereotactic frame revealed a maximum deviation of 3 mm [11] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the latter can provide excellent differentiation between parenchymal tumor and normal brain tissue, its main disadvantage is geometric image distortions caused by nonhomogeneity of the static magnetic field, nonlinearity of the imaging gradients, or eddy currents around the stereotactic frame. Although these can be significantly reduced by the newest efficient magnet shim procedures combined with actively shielded gradient designs, object-induced distortions caused by susceptibility effects at tissue-air interfaces and chemical shift displacement of adipose tissue remain remarkable, especially at magnetic fields of higher strengths [3][4][5] . A study comparing the target position during localization of the subthalamic nucleus based on the data of 1.5-tesla MRI and its real position on the phantom inserted into the stereotactic frame revealed a maximum deviation of 3 mm [11] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known, however, that CT and MRI have significant inherent limitations, which can negatively influence the accuracy of target localization [3][4][5] . The former usually could not provide precise differentiation of borders of the parenchymal brain lesion, whereas the latter was frequently accompanied by geometric image distortions caused by nonhomogeneity of the static magnetic field, nonlinearity of the imaging gradients, susceptibility effects at tissue-air interfaces and chemical shift displacement, especially at magnetic fields of higher strengths, or eddy currents around the stereotactic frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open and low field scanner has some advantages including greater T 1 image contrast, reduced vessel flow, ghost artifacts and the possibility of using patient immobilization devices limited by size in the conventional MRI scanners. Although it has higher system-related distortions which are possible to compensate for, patient-induced distortions are significantly less due to the lower field strength (Krempien RC et al 2003, Mack et al 2005.…”
Section: (B) Manipulation Of Mr Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI applications today go beyond TP to other RT processes due to some benefits over other modalities such as superior soft tissue definition, unlimited multi-planar volumetric imaging, physiological and biochemical information using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). The recent open and low magnetic field MR simulator (Krempien et al 2003Mack et al 2005 provides easier integration for planning. Ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) contrast agents can today be used to evaluate pathological lymph nodes treatment (Weissleder et al 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newer functional imaging techniques (PET scan, fMRI, invasive electrophysiologic studies) have significantly enriched and strengthened our knowledge regarding the topographic anatomy and physiology of the cingulate cortex and its associations [72,73,76,[91][92][93][94] . Additionally, the development of higher-resolution imaging techniques (high-field MRI units, newer pulse sequences) may well increase not only the accuracy of anatomic target localization but also the postoperative visualization of the created lesions.…”
Section: Psychiatric Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%