1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01214869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyticity of the semigroup generated by the Stokes operator inL r spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
218
0
12

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
218
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…We denote by Π the unbounded connected component of We denote by X p (Π) the closure of the space of divergence-free, C ∞ c (Π) vector fields with respect to the L p -norm. The Stokes operator in X p generates an analytic semigroup of class C 0 on X p (Π), for any 1 < p < ∞, see [13], so that, in particular, problem (2.1) is well-posed in X p (Π).…”
Section: Estimates For the Stokes Semigroupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote by Π the unbounded connected component of We denote by X p (Π) the closure of the space of divergence-free, C ∞ c (Π) vector fields with respect to the L p -norm. The Stokes operator in X p generates an analytic semigroup of class C 0 on X p (Π), for any 1 < p < ∞, see [13], so that, in particular, problem (2.1) is well-posed in X p (Π).…”
Section: Estimates For the Stokes Semigroupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may assume without loss of generality that 20) by using the A r -weightω j := ω j (Q) −1 ω j instead of ω j if necessary. Note that (3.20) also holds for r ′ , {ω ′ j } in the following form:…”
Section: Proof: Assume That This Lemma Is Wrong Then There Is a Consmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many papers dealing with resolvent estimates ( [7], [8], [15], [16], [20]; see Introduction of [10] for more details) or maximal regularity (see e.g. [1], [14], [16]) of Stokes operators for domains with compact as well as noncompact boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…introduit par Giga [9] pour leséquations stationnaires de Stokes aété beaucoupétudié ces dernières années pour leséquations stationnaires de Navier-Stokes. Nous donnons ici une nouvelle preuve plus simple de l'existence de solution très faible pour leséquations stationnaires de Navier-Stokes, qui s'appuie sur des arguments de densité et un cadre fonctionnel approprié pour définir de manière plus rigoureuse les traces des champs de vecteurs peu réguliers.…”
unclassified
“…The notion of very weak solutions (u, q) ∈ L p (Ω)×W −1,p (Ω) for the stationary Stokes or Navier-Stokes equations, corresponding to very irregular data, has been developed in the last years by Giga [9] (and also by Lions-Magenes [11] for the Laplace's equation, in a domain Ω of class C ∞ ), Amrouche-Girault [1] (in a domain Ω of class C 1,1 ) and more recently by Galdi-Simader-Sohr [8], Farwig-Galdi-Sohr [7] (in a domain Ω of class C 2,1 , see also Schumacher [14]) and finally by Kim [10] (in a domain Ω of class C 2 with connected boundary). In this context, the boundary condition is chosen in L p (Γ) (see Brown-Shen [3], Conca [5], Fabes-Kenig-Verchota [6], Moussaoui [12], Shen [15], Savaré [13]) or more generally in W −1/p,p (Γ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%