Analytically obtained data compared with shock tunnel heat flux measurements at a conical body at M = 6

Srulijes, J.; Seiler, F.

doi:10.1007/978-3-540-33287-9_23

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2010

Publication Types

Select...

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent0

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is done for both, the laminar and the turbulent case. For this purpose, the boundary layer approximations of Prandtl are applied to obtain solutions in terms of quasi-analytical relations, see Schlichting [1], Seiler et al [2] and Srulijes et al [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Heat Transfer at the Nose of a High-Speed Missile

Srulijes

Seiler

Hennig

et al. 2010

Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryThe heat loads during high-speed missile flight have to be considered in the design process by selecting appropriate geometries, structures and materials. To model these loads, especially at the nose, it is necessary to know the heat flux data in dependence of the time-dependent flow conditions. Therefore, great interest is focused on heat flux data gained from ISL shock tunnel experiments. These were done for Mach number between 3.5 and 10 for flight altitude conditions ranging from sea level up to 60 km. On the nose surface of a blunt and a sharp cone heat fluxes were measured with special, fast-reacting thin film temperature gauges. The results are compared with theoretical calculations based on the classical boundary layer theory for the laminar as well as for the turbulent boundary layer formation at a conical missile nose. Best agreement exists between the heat fluxes measured and the analytical solutions for a sharp cone.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%