2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43492-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Validation of Multiplex Biomarker Assay to Stratify Colorectal Cancer into Molecular Subtypes

Abstract: Previously, we classified colorectal cancers (CRCs) into five CRCAssigner (CRCA) subtypes with different prognoses and potential treatment responses, later consolidated into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS). Here we demonstrate the analytical development and validation of a custom NanoString nCounter platform-based biomarker assay (NanoCRCA) to stratify CRCs into subtypes. To reduce costs, we switched from the standard nCounter protocol to a custom modified protocol. The assay included a reduced 38-gene… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CRCassigner partitions tumors into the Inflammatory, Enterocyte, TA, Goblet-like and Stem-like subtypes. Because this system has received significant further development 34 , we studied the ability to represent CRCassigner subtypes with ColoType scores and subtypes, beginning in Cohort A training set. www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Using the published PAM algorithm ("Methods"), we computed the CRCassigner subtypes for Cohort A and compared these classifications with ColoType subtypes in the Cohort A training set ( Supplementary Table S3).…”
Section: Prediction Of Colotype Scores and Subtype For A Single New Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRCassigner partitions tumors into the Inflammatory, Enterocyte, TA, Goblet-like and Stem-like subtypes. Because this system has received significant further development 34 , we studied the ability to represent CRCassigner subtypes with ColoType scores and subtypes, beginning in Cohort A training set. www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Using the published PAM algorithm ("Methods"), we computed the CRCassigner subtypes for Cohort A and compared these classifications with ColoType subtypes in the Cohort A training set ( Supplementary Table S3).…”
Section: Prediction Of Colotype Scores and Subtype For A Single New Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On CMS classification, 14%, 20%, 12% and 22% of patients in our cohort were classified, respectively, into CMS1, CMS2, CMS3 and CMS4, in line with previous reports. 11 However, subtyping was undetermined in 32% of our samples using the 'predicted CMS' classification, probably due to limited quality of samples or intratumoural heterogeneity. 18 Moreover, we have previously reported intratumoural heterogeneity associated with transcriptional subtype of CRCA classification representing the presence of more than one subtype within a sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[8][9][10] Our study aims at integrating novel biological factors into a multimodal approach to improve on our ability to pinpoint the risk of relapse. These include molecular alterations at multiple omic levels, such as plasma ctDNA, CDX2 staining, inflammation-associated cytokines and the Colorectal Cancer Assigner (CRCA) classification according to a novel validated assay, 11 as well as CMS classification using a new assay method. 12…”
Section: Key Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NanoString platform uses short probes (35–50 nucleotides) to capture and quantify mRNA sequences and is therefore more compatible with fragmented RNA. Three recent studies have built customised NanoString probe sets and successfully classified panels of FFPE material according to CMS 75 , 87 , 131 . CMS classification between patient-matched FFPE and fresh frozen material was concordant, although sample size was limited 75 , 87 .…”
Section: Translation Of Cms To the Clinicmentioning
confidence: 99%