2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2006)132:10(1314)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Urban Storm Water Quality Models Based on Pollutant Buildup and Washoff Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a residential area with a surface texture depth of 0.76-0.92 mm produced an average solids loading of 0.81-1.79 g m -2 which increased to 1.75-2.22 g m -2 for a commercial area with a surface texture depth of 0.63-1.11 mm (Gunawardana et al, 2012). These values are considerably lower than the model predictions for TS obtained by Chen and Adams (2006) (Table S1) which are more compatible with the surface loading values reported by Carraz et al (2006) for urban roads (7.3 to 740 g m -2 ) and by Vaze and Chiew (2002) for a series of car parking bays (5-70 g m -2 ). Within the non-exhaust emissions category, re-suspension and emissions from brake and tyre wear have been identified as the largest sources of PM 10 with the particle mass, size and composition at any particular site being determined by factors such as material composition of the surface and vehicle components, their state of wear and the mode of driving (Thorpe and Harrison, 2008).…”
Section: Accumulation Of Particulates/solidscontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, a residential area with a surface texture depth of 0.76-0.92 mm produced an average solids loading of 0.81-1.79 g m -2 which increased to 1.75-2.22 g m -2 for a commercial area with a surface texture depth of 0.63-1.11 mm (Gunawardana et al, 2012). These values are considerably lower than the model predictions for TS obtained by Chen and Adams (2006) (Table S1) which are more compatible with the surface loading values reported by Carraz et al (2006) for urban roads (7.3 to 740 g m -2 ) and by Vaze and Chiew (2002) for a series of car parking bays (5-70 g m -2 ). Within the non-exhaust emissions category, re-suspension and emissions from brake and tyre wear have been identified as the largest sources of PM 10 with the particle mass, size and composition at any particular site being determined by factors such as material composition of the surface and vehicle components, their state of wear and the mode of driving (Thorpe and Harrison, 2008).…”
Section: Accumulation Of Particulates/solidscontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…This compares with a value of 1.7 x 10 -3 mm -1 for the wash-off of solids from low trafficked residential streets which was proposed by Ellis and Revitt (1991) based on an earlier review of the literature. Chen and Adams (2006) have predicted the wash-off rate constants for a range of pollutants from a residential area in Toronto, Canada and obtained highest values for TSS, TKN and TP (1.27 x 10 -2 to 1.78 x 10 -2 mm -1 ) with the lowest values for COD (3.0 x 10 -3 mm -1 ).…”
Section: Wash-off Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the non-linear build-up models, the power function, the exponential function and the Michaelis-Menton function are the main types found in water quality literature (Wang and Li 2009). Amongst them, the exponential function is the most widely employed build-up model (Chen and Adams 2006). Most of the available models generate accumulation of pollutants in the form of decreasing rate with increasing dry days.…”
Section: Pollutant Build-upmentioning
confidence: 99%