Analytical Ultracentrifugation 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-55985-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Ultracentrifugation Data Analysis with UltraScan-III

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
114
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
114
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The scans also were analyzed by the time‐derivative method to obtain the sedimentation coefficient distribution, g(s*) (Stafford, ). All sedimentation coefficients are expressed in Svedberg units (S); one Svedberg is equal to 10 −13 s. All data editing and analyses were conducted using the UltraScanIII software (Demeler & Gorbet, in press).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scans also were analyzed by the time‐derivative method to obtain the sedimentation coefficient distribution, g(s*) (Stafford, ). All sedimentation coefficients are expressed in Svedberg units (S); one Svedberg is equal to 10 −13 s. All data editing and analyses were conducted using the UltraScanIII software (Demeler & Gorbet, in press).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lysozyme, for use as a scattering standard, was solubilized in 150 mM NaCl, 40 mM sodium acetate, pH 3.8, and dialyzed against the same buffer with the final dialysate 22 for details on intensity measurements, which allow up to two samples to be measured per cell). All data were analyzed using UltraScan-III, revision 2029 (23). Time and radially invariant noise was removed during analysis with the two-dimensional spectrum analysis (24), and diffusion-corrected sedimentation coefficient distributions were calculated with the enhanced van HoldeWeischet method (25).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments are more effective, although limited to extremely monodisperse systems, for determination of molecular weight ( M w ) of proteins as well as investigation of protein–protein interactions2122. Data analysis software available such as Ultrascan23 or SEDFIT1724 provide user-friendly platforms to assess the quality of data and pre-defined models for homogeneous/heterogeneous protein–protein interactions with different stoichiometry. Most of the models, however, require well-defined molecular weight ( M w ) and extinction coefficients ( ɛ ) of the interacting species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%