1984
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.153.2.6091173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical tools for magnetic resonance imaging.

Abstract: The response of different magnetic resonance (MR) techniques to tissue parameters - T1, T2, and N(H) - is a determinant of clinical efficacy. The large possible number of imaging techniques and range of variable parameters for each make it difficult to perform exhaustive evaluations in a single patient or even in animal models. In addition, changes in operating magnetic field strength change the relaxation times sufficiently so that the efficacy of a technique at a given field does not imply similar results at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential value of relaxation rates for characterization of brain tissues was initially suggested by Ortendahl and coworkers (22). More recently, multispectral approaches based on R,, R,, and N(H) have been proposed for brain segmentation (14,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential value of relaxation rates for characterization of brain tissues was initially suggested by Ortendahl and coworkers (22). More recently, multispectral approaches based on R,, R,, and N(H) have been proposed for brain segmentation (14,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each histogram has a resolution of 1/256 of the maximum axis value. Histograms of inverse T1 and Tz were chosen as this space displayed, more clearly, normal tissue clusters and was reported to clearly separate pathology (23). The range of T2-l values selected for the T2-' axis of the histograms was 10 times larger than for T1-l because T2 values are less than Tl values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then from [l] to [3], the constant -y20(kx + k,) is in the order of 1.8 X which is very small in comparison with other sources of experimental error. As a result, spin diffusion in imaging experiments is not a significant source of errors unless very strong gradients or samples with very long T, and very large diffusion constants are used.…”
Section: I41mentioning
confidence: 99%