1975
DOI: 10.1039/f19757100285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical theories of the steric stabilization of colloidal dispersions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential needed to balance the osmotic pressure difference, and hence prevent the influx of solvent particles into the region with a reduced concentration, is effectively an additional repulsive term. This term has been studied extensively by Meier, [43] Napper and coworkers, [44] and Halperin and co-workers [45] in order to model the steric stabilization of colloidal dispersions by an adsorbed polymeric layer. Their approach, based on the Flory-Huggins theory of free energy of polymer mixing, has been further extended by Vincent et al, [46] and has been used to account for the steric repulsion between NPs covered by alkylthiol monolayers, [23] as well as in other more complex geometries.…”
Section: Ligand Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential needed to balance the osmotic pressure difference, and hence prevent the influx of solvent particles into the region with a reduced concentration, is effectively an additional repulsive term. This term has been studied extensively by Meier, [43] Napper and coworkers, [44] and Halperin and co-workers [45] in order to model the steric stabilization of colloidal dispersions by an adsorbed polymeric layer. Their approach, based on the Flory-Huggins theory of free energy of polymer mixing, has been further extended by Vincent et al, [46] and has been used to account for the steric repulsion between NPs covered by alkylthiol monolayers, [23] as well as in other more complex geometries.…”
Section: Ligand Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shown in figure 1 is a comparison for F = 0.01 of Sf for four distribution functions: the exponential, the constant, the Gaussian and the radial Gaussian functions. The constant density function = 1/L [19] and the radial Gaussian density function 0 = 4:z x 2 exp {--x2/2b2L2}/(1 --F) x (2:zb2L2) a/2 [20] were considered previously (13,14). Of course, the scaling parameter b in eq.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we have added in the value of Sff at do = L as predicted by eq. [14]. This is necessary because the Der-jaguin integration of eq.…”
Section: The Interpenetrational Domainmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the need to evaluate this term has been stressed by Ottewill (2, 3) on more than one occasion, no simple analytic formulae have yet been developed which allow the magnitude of the elastic contribution to be evaluated easily. In this paper we use the Flory network theory to derive such formulae for the several different models of steric stabilization that we have considered previously (4). These are the constant segment density model (hereafter termed model I), the denting model (model II) and the gaussian segment density distribution function model (model III).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%