2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2019.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical solutions of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation within an interstitial electrical double layer in various geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For planar geometry, exact solutions to the nonlinear PB equations also exist for symmetric and asymmetric electrolyte solutions [Andrietti et al, 1976, Chapman, 1913, Gouy, 1910, Grahame, 1953. A few studies have presented analytical solutions to describe electrostatic potential between two similarly charged particles in terms of complex integrals [Coussy, 2010a, Polat and Polat, 2010, Saboorian-Jooybari and Chen, 2019, Zhang et al, 2018. However, approximate solutions are generally only sufficiently accurate for surface separations beyond about one Debye length (please see [Israelachvili, 2011] for the definition and interpretation of Debye length), and one needs to seek numerical solutions [Anandarajah and Chen, 1994, Bohinc et al, 2016, Brumleve and Buck, 1978, Gross and Osterle, 1968, Olivares and McQuarrie, 1975, Ramanathan, 1983 for problems with complex geometry and high surface charge densities.…”
Section: Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For planar geometry, exact solutions to the nonlinear PB equations also exist for symmetric and asymmetric electrolyte solutions [Andrietti et al, 1976, Chapman, 1913, Gouy, 1910, Grahame, 1953. A few studies have presented analytical solutions to describe electrostatic potential between two similarly charged particles in terms of complex integrals [Coussy, 2010a, Polat and Polat, 2010, Saboorian-Jooybari and Chen, 2019, Zhang et al, 2018. However, approximate solutions are generally only sufficiently accurate for surface separations beyond about one Debye length (please see [Israelachvili, 2011] for the definition and interpretation of Debye length), and one needs to seek numerical solutions [Anandarajah and Chen, 1994, Bohinc et al, 2016, Brumleve and Buck, 1978, Gross and Osterle, 1968, Olivares and McQuarrie, 1975, Ramanathan, 1983 for problems with complex geometry and high surface charge densities.…”
Section: Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One goal in this work is to calculate the apparent surface charge density. In fact, we place the answer to this question into the more general context of characterizing the degree of counterion release for slab-like planar geometries, and we carry out our analysis using the Poisson–Boltzmann model, which is a simple approach to describe ion concentrations near macroions on the mean-field level. Analytic solutions of the nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation exist for only a few geometries and surface charge density distributions or for some limiting cases. , Yet, when available, these solutions provide a conceptual understanding of observable quantities such as the osmotic pressure between macroions or in polyelectrolyte solutions, the condensation of counterions, the influence of electrostatics on the phase behavior of charged colloids and nanoparticles, and on the stability , and rigidity of soft aggregates. , Our present work adds the number of released counterions to this list.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16−19 Analytic solutions of the nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann equation exist for only a few geometries 20−22 and surface charge density distributions 23 or for some limiting cases. 24,25 Yet, when available, these solutions provide a conceptual understanding of observable quantities such as the osmotic pressure between macroions or in polyelectrolyte solutions, 26−28 the condensation of counterions, 29−32 the influence of electrostatics on the phase behavior of charged colloids and nanoparticles, 33−36 and on the stability 37,38 and rigidity of soft aggregates. 39,40 Our present work adds the number of released counterions to this list.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These solutions are explicit in form, but with no exception involve some unknown parameters which have to be determined numerically prior to the evaluation of electric potential. Most recently, Saboorian-Jooybari and Chen [19] presented the exact solution of the P-B equation in the parallel-plate geometry under the assumption of a zero electric potential at the center of geometry. This underlying assumption corresponds to the non-overlapping EDLs which are valid and consistent with the electroneutrality condition in natural settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%