2012
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201100325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical solutions and validation of electric field and dielectrophoretic force in a bio‐microfluidic channel

Abstract: In a microbiological device, cell or particle manipulation and characterization require the use of electric field on different electrodes in several configurations and shapes. To efficiently design microelectrodes within a microfluidic channel for dielectrophoresis focusing, manipulation and characterization of cells, the designer will seek the exact distribution of the electric potential, electric field and hence dielectrophoresis force exerted on the cell within the microdevice. In this paper we describe the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AC‐based DEP requires nonuniform electric field which, in general, is created using conductive electrodes . The DEP force on a spherical polarizable microentity under nonuniform electric field while immersed in a conductive medium is defined by : F DEP =2πεnormalmr3 Re f cm E rms 2where ε m is the permittivity of the medium, r is the radius of the microentity, E is the electric field, and Re[ f CM ] is the real part of Clausius–Mossotti factor that depends on the complex permittivities of the microentity and the suspended medium and is defined as: f cm =εpεmεp+2εmwhere ε * is the complex permittivity that is a function of the dielectric constant ε , the angular frequency ω , and the real conductivity σ and is given by: ε*=εjσωwhere j is the imaginary unit, j=1…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AC‐based DEP requires nonuniform electric field which, in general, is created using conductive electrodes . The DEP force on a spherical polarizable microentity under nonuniform electric field while immersed in a conductive medium is defined by : F DEP =2πεnormalmr3 Re f cm E rms 2where ε m is the permittivity of the medium, r is the radius of the microentity, E is the electric field, and Re[ f CM ] is the real part of Clausius–Mossotti factor that depends on the complex permittivities of the microentity and the suspended medium and is defined as: f cm =εpεmεp+2εmwhere ε * is the complex permittivity that is a function of the dielectric constant ε , the angular frequency ω , and the real conductivity σ and is given by: ε*=εjσωwhere j is the imaginary unit, j=1…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electric potential inside the microchannel is described using the Laplace equation, Eq. , and is based on the assumption that there are no electric charges inside the microchannel . ΔV=0 where Vx,z=fVnormalo,D ch ,dnormale,gnormalewhere V ( V ) is the electric potential, V o ( V ) is the actuation voltage, D ch (m or μm) is the microchannel depth, d e (m or μm) is the electrode length, and g e (m or μm) is the electrode gap length.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the force due to DEP depends on the electric field, the electrode configurations that generate the electric field need to be given significant consideration while designing DEP-FFF microdevices. To this extend researchers have envisioned and analyzed several electrode configurations (Alazzam et al, 2010;Nerguizian et al, 2012;Nieuwenhuis and Vellekoop, 2004). The force due to DEP associated with each electrode configuration is unique and consequently the trajectory of microparticles in a DEP-FFF microdevice would also be unique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%