2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-009-9421-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Solution of Viscous Flow in Porous Media Using ADM and Comparison with the Numerical Runge–Kutta Method

Abstract: In this article, the problem of laminar viscous flow in a semi-porous channel in the presence of a transverse magnetic field is presented, and the Adomian decomposition method is employed to compute an approximation for the solution of the system of nonlinear differential equations governing on the problem. Then, we consider the influence of the two dimensionless numbers: the Hartmann number (Ha) for the description of the magnetic forces and the Reynolds number (Re) for the dynamic forces. The results of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Berman (1953) analyzed the boundary layer flow of a Newtonian fluid through a porous channel through self similar exact solution. His solution was further generalized by several other researchers (Cox, 1991;Zaturska et al, 1988;Desseaus, 1999;Ganji and Ganji, 2010). Vajravelu and Kumar (2004) investigated axially symmetric hydromagnetic flow between two horizontal plates in a rotating system where the lower plate was a stretching sheet and the upper plate was subjected to uniform injection, with the help of numerical and analytical solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berman (1953) analyzed the boundary layer flow of a Newtonian fluid through a porous channel through self similar exact solution. His solution was further generalized by several other researchers (Cox, 1991;Zaturska et al, 1988;Desseaus, 1999;Ganji and Ganji, 2010). Vajravelu and Kumar (2004) investigated axially symmetric hydromagnetic flow between two horizontal plates in a rotating system where the lower plate was a stretching sheet and the upper plate was subjected to uniform injection, with the help of numerical and analytical solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the semi-exact methods which does not need small parameters is the differential transformation method (DTM). Therefore, same as the homotopy analysis (Moghimi et al, 2011;Bararnia et al, 2010;Ghotbi et al, 2009Ghotbi et al, , 2011Asgharian et al, 2010;Ghsemi et al, 2012), the homotopy perturbation method (Bararnia et al, 2011;Barari et al, 2008a, b;Sheikholeslami et al, 2011;Raftari and Yildirim, 2011;Miansari et al, 2010) and the Adomian decomposition method (Ganji et al, 2010(Ganji et al, , 2011Sheikholeslami et al, 2012), the DTM can overcome the restrictions and limitations of perturbation methods. This method constructs an analytical solution in the form of a polynomial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there are some limitations with the common perturbation method, and also because the basis of the common perturbation method was based upon the existence of a small parameter, developing the method for different applications is very difficult. Therefore, many different new methods have recently been introduced allowing ways to eliminate the small parameter, such as the artificial parameter method (Liu, 1997), the homotopy analysis method (Liao, 1995), the variational iteration method (He, 1998a(He, , b, 1999bHe et al, 2010;Faraz et al, 2011), the Adomian decomposition method (Adomian, 1994;Wazwaz, 2006;Ganji and Ganji, 2010), the Laplace decomposition method (Khan, 2009), the homotopy perturbation transform method (Khan and Wu, 2011) and the differential transform method (Rashidi, 2009). One of the semi-exact methods is the homotopy perturbation method (HPM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%