2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical solution of the dynamic response of buried pipelines under blast wave

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e PVC tubes were thin and of low strength and thus had little e ect on the experimental results. e square tubes were simply supported on a bracket [2,[6][7][8]. e contact area between the square tube and the bracket was kept small enough to ensure that this contact area had little in uence on the experimental results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e PVC tubes were thin and of low strength and thus had little e ect on the experimental results. e square tubes were simply supported on a bracket [2,[6][7][8]. e contact area between the square tube and the bracket was kept small enough to ensure that this contact area had little in uence on the experimental results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al [5] investigated energy absorption capability and bending collapse behaviour of an aluminium (Al)/carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) short square hollow section (SHS) beam under transverse quasistatic loading. Abedi et al [6] found the pipe displacement and peak particle velocity under a blast wave equivalent dynamic load by establishing a mathematical model. Wu et al [7] conducted experimental and numerical studies on the dynamic response of metal cylindrical shells under the combined effects of fragments and shock waves and obtained three failure modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an engineering perspective, horizontal excitation is very important, especially for some geotechnical works, such as the dynamic installation of a pipe segment using underground trenchless technology (Figure 1). Many attempts to measure the influence of underground works on existing infrastructure have been made and reported in the course of large infrastructural projects, mainly including tunnelling works [22][23][24]. The impact of dynamic guided jacking is often considered "less important", which is why there is a lack of research on this type of excitation.…”
Section: Introduction: the Importance Of The Analysed Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, many experts and scholars have studied the allowable vibration velocity criterion of buried pipelines under the impact of blast waves. The recommended ground peak particle velocity (GPPV) safety criterion ranges from 2.0 cm/s to 15 cm/s with a wide span [25][26][27][28][29]. In actuality, the difference in the responses of different pipes subjected to the same blast wave may be very large due to varying materials and types of pipe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of representative research on buried pipelines subjected to the impact of blast waves include the following: Dowding's calculation formula, which is derived from a plane wave with constant amplitude, whose calculation result can be used as the upper limit of the response of buried pipelines under far-field plane waves [30]; and the empirical formulas proposed by Esparza et al based on model and field test data, which require applicable site conditions and experimental environments [28]. There are also two typical semi-theoretical, semi-empirical formulas: One by Kouretzis et al, which is based on the harmonic assumption and uses a thin shell cylindrical model [31], and another by Abedi et al, which is based on the law of pressure attenuation of blast waves and uses the beam model on elastic foundation [29]. In these two formulas, the blast wave and pipe were simplified by different types, and therefore, their applications require further investigation and analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%