Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.12989/sem.2015.54.4.607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical solution of a contact problem and comparison with the results from FEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this early formulation of the DECM, the boundaries of the sub-domains are the interfaces of discontinuity of the constitutive properties ( Figure 2c and Figure 3). Therefore, a DECM analysis addresses the static problem between sub-domains of different materials as a static contact problem [46], which is easy to manage with the Cell Method, while it is not trivial in the differential formulation [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Basic Principles Of the Discrete Elements Cell Methods (Decm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this early formulation of the DECM, the boundaries of the sub-domains are the interfaces of discontinuity of the constitutive properties ( Figure 2c and Figure 3). Therefore, a DECM analysis addresses the static problem between sub-domains of different materials as a static contact problem [46], which is easy to manage with the Cell Method, while it is not trivial in the differential formulation [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Basic Principles Of the Discrete Elements Cell Methods (Decm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between the top of the subbase and the bottom of the base, the interaction between the lower surface of the subbase and the upper surface of subgrade were simulated by the use of hard contact interface elements and isotropic Coulomb friction model, the coefficient of friction was assumed 1.5. The sides between the two neighboring slabs at the joint were considered to have a zero gap with a Coulomb friction of 1.5 mimicking a restricted aggregate interlocking [24].…”
Section: Modelling Of Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, [15] developed a solution based on FEM for the plane contact problem of elastic bodies. Then, many researchers have solved the contact problems by using FEM [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Besides, in recent years, the studies have increased that analytical results are compared with FEM results of contact problems for FG layers [26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%