2019
DOI: 10.1002/asna.201913540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Resolution of the Dark Night Sky (Olbers') Paradox

Abstract: We derive a spatiotemporal analytical resolution of the dark night sky, or Olbers' paradox, first showing that in an infinitely large universe the cumulative solid angle of the light that is projected upon the celestial sphere by an infinite population of directly observable stars is indeed finite. Using the GAIA DR2 data, we show that the number radial density of the stars that are directly visible has a radial distribution that is quasi‐unimodal, and that such a radial distribution is constrained by the inve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we can restate our earlier conclusion by noting that any star that has an apparent magnitude of fainter than 8 will not be visible to the average unaided human eye, and can, therefore, be considered non-existent for the analysis of the cumulative apparent brightness of the night sky under observation by the unaided eye. This limiting apparent magnitude constraint acts as a high-pass apparent brightness filter that effectively removes all fainter stars from the population of visible stars as far as unaided eye vision is concerned, thereby rendering finite the population of visible stars, irrespective of the initial size of the population of stars that exist in the universe, a population that may indeed be infinite" [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we can restate our earlier conclusion by noting that any star that has an apparent magnitude of fainter than 8 will not be visible to the average unaided human eye, and can, therefore, be considered non-existent for the analysis of the cumulative apparent brightness of the night sky under observation by the unaided eye. This limiting apparent magnitude constraint acts as a high-pass apparent brightness filter that effectively removes all fainter stars from the population of visible stars as far as unaided eye vision is concerned, thereby rendering finite the population of visible stars, irrespective of the initial size of the population of stars that exist in the universe, a population that may indeed be infinite" [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we can restate our earlier conclusion by noting that any star that has an apparent magnitude of fainter than 8 will not be visible to the average unaided human eye, and can, therefore, be considered non-existent for the analysis of the cumulative apparent brightness of the night sky under observation by the unaided eye. This limiting apparent magnitude constraint acts as a high-pass apparent brightness filter that effectively removes all fainter stars from the population of visible stars as far as unaided eye vision is concerned, thereby rendering finite the population of visible stars, irrespective of the initial size of the population of stars that exist in the universe, a population that may indeed be infinite" (Harari, 2019). Harari's solution of Olber's paradox is tuned with the solution proposed in this article: the stars in the universe that have an apparent magnitude below 8 and are at a finite distance from the Earth are invisible to the unaided human eye, which means that the luminosity of stars at a finite distance is not strong enough, to make the night sky a day.…”
Section: Olbers' Paradox Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%