2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11618-009-0069-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical potentials of the Socio-economic panel (SOEP) for empirical educational research

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) started assessing locus of control as early as the 1990s. In recent years, measures for risk aversion, the Big Five personality dimensions, intelligence, and a number of other major psychological variables have been incorporated into the study (Lohmann, Spieß, Groh-Samberg, & Schupp, 2009;Schupp, Spieß, & Wagner 2008). Other large-scale panel or cross-sectional studies, such as the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), the European Social Survey (ESS), the German National Education Panel Study (NEPS), the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES), the German Panel Study ''Labour Market and Social Security'' (PASS), the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS), and the DNB Household Survey (DHS), have followed this trend and now include psychological variables in their questionnaires (cf.…”
Section: Assessing Psychological Constructs In Large-scale Social Sur...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) started assessing locus of control as early as the 1990s. In recent years, measures for risk aversion, the Big Five personality dimensions, intelligence, and a number of other major psychological variables have been incorporated into the study (Lohmann, Spieß, Groh-Samberg, & Schupp, 2009;Schupp, Spieß, & Wagner 2008). Other large-scale panel or cross-sectional studies, such as the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), the European Social Survey (ESS), the German National Education Panel Study (NEPS), the German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES), the German Panel Study ''Labour Market and Social Security'' (PASS), the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey, the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS), and the DNB Household Survey (DHS), have followed this trend and now include psychological variables in their questionnaires (cf.…”
Section: Assessing Psychological Constructs In Large-scale Social Sur...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andererseits sind in vielen Berufssegmenten längerfris-tige bis dauerhafte Upgrading-Prozesse der schulischen Zugangsvoraussetzungen zu beobachten, die nicht immer mit tatsächlichen (beobachtbaren) Veränderungen in den kognitiven oder nicht-kognitiven beruflichen Anforderungen einhergehen. (Lohmann et al 2009;Solga et al 2005 Logit-(und auch Probit-)Regressionen bringen das sogenannte "Skalierungsproblem" (Best und Wolf 2012: 384) mit sich. Logistische Regressionen schätzen den Effekt von beobachteten unabhängigen Variablen auf die unbeobachtete latente metrische Variable y*.…”
Section: Berufunclassified
“…Designed as a household panel study, the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) provides an important database for educational research (Lohmann et al 2009). Starting in 1984 with a sample at the household level, each member of the household as well as their offspring should be followed for as long as possible (Wagner et al 2007).…”
Section: Systematic Empirical Studies Of Upper Secondary Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%