2006 3rd International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems 2006
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2006.4362307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical Performance Evaluation of Mixed Services with Variable Data Rates for the Uplink of UMTS

Abstract: The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we introduce a new efficient analytical method for uplink performance estimation in multi-service UMTS networks by taking the dynamic behaviour of the user transmission rate into account. Our performance measures are the average user information rate and the blocking probability of new calls. Next, a traffic management technique is applied to UMTS and incorporated into the analytical approach to specify how resources have to be adequately engineered to meet qua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 shows, the DTMC describing the system is irreversible (all arrows are valid -ignore the X's on the arrows, at the moment); therefore, this system does not have a product form solution. By introducing the following three approximations (used also in [3] and [9]), we modify the DTMC, in order to make it reversible and consequently (in the next subsection) determine the state probabilities, q(j), recursively: a) Local balance approximation (LBA): local balance exists between adjacent system states (rate up = rate down). b) Migration approximation (MA): calls accepted with other than the maximum bandwidth requirement are negligible within a space, which is called migration space.…”
Section: B Basic Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 shows, the DTMC describing the system is irreversible (all arrows are valid -ignore the X's on the arrows, at the moment); therefore, this system does not have a product form solution. By introducing the following three approximations (used also in [3] and [9]), we modify the DTMC, in order to make it reversible and consequently (in the next subsection) determine the state probabilities, q(j), recursively: a) Local balance approximation (LBA): local balance exists between adjacent system states (rate up = rate down). b) Migration approximation (MA): calls accepted with other than the maximum bandwidth requirement are negligible within a space, which is called migration space.…”
Section: B Basic Approximationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single base station (BS) controlling a cell is modeled as a system of certain bandwidth capacity, in the uplink direction. The number of users roaming in the cell or in its vicinity is usually considered infinite [2], [3]; however, due to the limited coverage area of a cell, it is more realistic to be considered finite. Therefore, for each service-class we assume a quasi-random call arrival process (loosely speaking: random arriving calls generated by finite number of sources) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter refers to a link that accommodates Poisson arriving calls of K service-classes with different bandwidth requirements and generally distributed service times; we name this model Erlang Multirate Loss Model (EMLM). In [7], [9] and [13], calls follow a Poisson process, while the models of [6], [10] cover Poisson, Bernoulli and Pascal traffic, based on the model of [16]. In [8], [11] and [12] calls come from a finite number of users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], [11] and [12] calls come from a finite number of users. Apart from the different arrival processes considered in [6]- [13], these models also differ in the modelling of local blocking; e.g., the modelling approach of [6], [10] is more complicated compared to [7], as it is shown in [11]. Therefore, herein, we adopt the model of [7] for the local blocking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%