The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1997
DOI: 10.1080/014311697217495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical parameterization of canopy directional emissivity and directional radiance in the thermal infrared. Application on the retrieval of soil and foliage temperatures using two directional measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(5) Norman, 1997, 1999;Francois et al, 1997;Chehbouni et al, 2001;Merlin and Chehbouni, 2004). View angle effects are, however, most pronounced for sparse canopies, where a change in view angle will cause a large difference in the fraction of soil and vegetation within the footprint of the radiometer, and while the view-angle approach has proven useful when using ground-based measurements, only one viewing angle is usually available for satellite images.…”
Section: Distributed Evaluation Against Latent Heat Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) Norman, 1997, 1999;Francois et al, 1997;Chehbouni et al, 2001;Merlin and Chehbouni, 2004). View angle effects are, however, most pronounced for sparse canopies, where a change in view angle will cause a large difference in the fraction of soil and vegetation within the footprint of the radiometer, and while the view-angle approach has proven useful when using ground-based measurements, only one viewing angle is usually available for satellite images.…”
Section: Distributed Evaluation Against Latent Heat Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where M represents the hemispheric average gap frequency [21]; and α is the cavity effect coefficient. According to Ren et al [33], this value can be estimated using the 4SAIL model.…”
Section: Component Effective Emissivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous efforts have been directed toward inverting component temperatures using both experimental and satellite-borne multi-angle datasets [16][17][18][19]. Many directional algorithms have been proposed based on radiative transfer models (RTMs), such as the geometric model proposed by Kimes et al [20] for row-planted crops and the analytical RTM known as FR97 proposed by Francois et al [21] for homogenous canopies. Using these RTMs, the temperatures of surface sunlit and shaded areas and their vertical distributions can be inverted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have derived the component temperatures under the limiting-cases, from which we simulated the radiometric surface temperature under the limiting cases, T r,dry , T r,wet , andT r,trans using a directional thermal infrared radiative transfer model of the canopy. In this study, the model proposed by François (1997) was used to simulate directional radiometric surface temperatures. In the simulation, the observing zenith angle takes the actual angle in the field measurement of T r , and the soil and foliage emissivity takes the value of 0.94 and 0.98 following François (1997) and François (2002).…”
Section: Parameterization Scheme Based On Limiting Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the model proposed by François (1997) was used to simulate directional radiometric surface temperatures. In the simulation, the observing zenith angle takes the actual angle in the field measurement of T r , and the soil and foliage emissivity takes the value of 0.94 and 0.98 following François (1997) and François (2002). So the actual heat fluxes can be derived based on the comparison between the actual surface temperature and the simulated surface temperature under the limiting-cases.…”
Section: Parameterization Scheme Based On Limiting Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%