2000
DOI: 10.1080/002075400188654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical models to predict the performance of a single-machine system under periodic and event-driven rescheduling strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A new scheduling can be prepared at any time of occurring of unexpected event (see, Wu et al, 1993;Bierwirth & Mattfeld, 1999), or, similar to Church and Uzsoy (1992), be created in predetermined intervals, or, similar to Vieira et al (2000), be formed when a certain threshold of deflection is reached. while reactive scheduling requires a significant processing time along with various successive calculations, one of the most important benefits of this method is immediate reaction to unexpected events.…”
Section: Reactive Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new scheduling can be prepared at any time of occurring of unexpected event (see, Wu et al, 1993;Bierwirth & Mattfeld, 1999), or, similar to Church and Uzsoy (1992), be created in predetermined intervals, or, similar to Vieira et al (2000), be formed when a certain threshold of deflection is reached. while reactive scheduling requires a significant processing time along with various successive calculations, one of the most important benefits of this method is immediate reaction to unexpected events.…”
Section: Reactive Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the predictive‐reactive scheduling (PRS) approach to identify and prioritize a list of real‐time events and activities that may occur during the operation of a food facility. The PRS approach is the dynamic scheduling technique most commonly used in modeling complex systems, such as manufacturing operations (Aytug, Lawley, McKay, Mohan, & Uzsoy, ; Herroelen & Leus, ; Mehta & Uzsoy, ; Vieira, Herrman, & Lin, ; Vieira, Herrman, & Lin, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the rule used for developing the scheduling system, dynamic scheduling can be divided into four categories [36][37][38]:…”
Section: Dynamic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%