2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical modelling of a magnetization curve obtained by the measurements of magnetic materials’ properties using evolutionary algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The routine begins with parameter initialization, with high accuracy possible with appropriate initial values. 52 The result of the background subtraction and LM fitting option for P1 is included in Figure 4c and is also found to be in agreement with the VSM result. A second automated fitting was attempted on the data following background subtraction using a singular value decomposition (SVD), 53 which does not rely on an estimate of starting points and is reported to extract useable dipole forms from noisy data or weak signals with high accuracy.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The routine begins with parameter initialization, with high accuracy possible with appropriate initial values. 52 The result of the background subtraction and LM fitting option for P1 is included in Figure 4c and is also found to be in agreement with the VSM result. A second automated fitting was attempted on the data following background subtraction using a singular value decomposition (SVD), 53 which does not rely on an estimate of starting points and is reported to extract useable dipole forms from noisy data or weak signals with high accuracy.…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This is the same algorithm implemented by the MPMS3 for dipole fitting and is widely used for curve fitting. The routine begins with parameter initialization, with high accuracy possible with appropriate initial values . The result of the background subtraction and LM fitting option for P1 is included in Figure c and is also found to be in agreement with the VSM result.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…end-for 18. until a termination condition is met For all tests we used 83,160 FEs, which were appropriate in [66] for nine parameters, and in this work we are dealing with five (D = 5) or six parameters (D = 6). The population size is ten times the number of parameters, fifty for five parameters and sixty for six parameters.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Parameters Using Evolutionary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%